Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
How can deny the importance of museums in the reputation of a country? Human beings are always seeking ways for responding to their curiosity about their and other nations' past. One of the most important places for responding to our curiosity is museums. In this regard, many are of the opinion that for finding out about a country the best place is museums, while others believe that by interacting with people or roaming in the country or cities, we can find out about that country. I agree with the first idea rather than the second one for two main reasons which will be presented here.
First, for the finding of the culture and civilization of a country, museums are the best place. As we all know, objects and artifacts are classified in museums based on historical events. Thus, by visiting a museum, we are able to get sufficient knowledge about their past culture, which has a direct influence on their contemporary age. In addition, museums create us an opportunity for evaluating their history for a few hours. For instance, the Louver museum is one of the most well-known museums in the world, which was established after France Revolution, by walking in there, we can find many objects and artifacts from ancient times until the contemporary age. As a result, by walking in a museum we can obtain plenty of information about a country's history.
Second, museums have so significant role in a country's view of technology. By evaluating objects and documents in a museum, we are able to get much information about the economic situation, careers, and science of a country. For example, artifacts that are shown in museums have some additional explanations. By reading them, we can become aware of the metals and materials which were fashionable in their ancient time. Some were made from gold and special combinations of metals which have shown their advanced technology. This information may help us know about the technological conditions in that country.
In conclusion, all of the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that visiting a museum in order to know about a country is so beneficial and has two important fruit. The first one is that we can know about their culture and civilization; additionally, we can know about their economic and technological conditions.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives Use specific reasons and examp 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 449, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...ple or roaming in the country or cities, we can find out about that country. I ag...
Line 4, column 16, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...itions in that country. In conclusion, all of the aforementioned reasons lead us to the c...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1915.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97402597403 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88089770683 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467532467532 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 605.7 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1954124781 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.789473684 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2631578947 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94736842105 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16421862405 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0605632070362 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410601572925 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113556076281 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292484487843 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.