Question :Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
— Interrupt and correct the mistake right away.
— Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader.
— Say nothing.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In today's modern world, participating in a class or a meeting is one of the inseparable parts of our life, and we are always attending these kinds of activities. However, sometimes, the leader of the meeting and class may make some mistakes during a presentation that may be intentional or unintentional for the evaluation audience. In this regard, people have different views about correcting mistakes. I, personally, believe that waiting until the class or meeting is over, and talking with the lecturer is the best approach because of two reasons that will be mentioned here.
First, self-confidence is one of the most important factors in presenting a topic, and it has special importance. A person who starts to present a topic in front of 30-40 people should have a high level of self-confidence. On the other hand, self-confidence is a fragile issue, and it might break by means of an unsuitable question or comment. In addition, not telling something about false information, also, may convey some information that correcting these misunderstandings take a great deal of time and trying. As a result, correcting a mistake is so vital, but we should observe some basic rules.
Second, every person has a different point of view and approach about issues; therefore, all of us have experienced some misunderstandings in the classroom that are not related to the points and the procedure of that class and meeting. We may ask some questions or ideas that cause distribute other students' minds. In other words, presenting a concept at an inappropriate time or place may create problems in the learning process. Thus, for overcoming these problems, most of the professional lectures offer opportunities, at least for some minutes, for question and answer, which is an excellent strategy.
In conclusion, all of the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that presenting is a hard issue that strongly needs self-confidence. In addition, we may convey some information during the lecture that has a bad influence on other people's minds who participate in that meeting and class.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 16, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... an excellent strategy. In conclusion, all of the aforementioned reasons lead us to the c...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, at least, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1755.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 340.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16176470588 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22877819779 2.67179642975 121% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544117647059 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4140786177 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.93333333333 5.45110844103 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141089011428 0.236089414692 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456924506767 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424265455098 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0873568424147 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059775658041 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.