reading paper is better or watching electronic devices?
By and large, it is beyond doubt that education plays an integral role in developing the personality of a person. In this regard, getting information from all possible sources is of paramount importance. There has been no shortage of debate among scholars whether studying from paper books is beneficial or by using electronic devices. As for the writer's opinion, I subscribe to the idea of utilizing paper materials to obtain information. To what follows, I will delve into the most crucial reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
The first compelling reason corroborating my opinion is that reading from printed materials prevents eye problems and brain damage. It is notable that light coming out of screens of mobile phones causes profound damage to the eyes. Moreover, the electromagnetic rays posses a threat to brain cells. Due to the drawbacks of using electronic devices, it is better to consume printed materials for studying. It is worth mentioning that written data also develop critical thinking ability and improve grammar. Since by watching television this can not be expected, its use should be limited. Thus, reading printed papers is recommended. By way of illustration, last week my son had an eye checkup appointment. His doctor told him that his vision is not clear and prescribed eyeglasses. The reason behind this was that my son is taking virtual school nowadays because of a pandemic. If he was doing hybrid learning and read from books, his vision had not been affected. This example clearly illustrates my idea.
The second rationale behind my viewpoint is rooted in the fact that the source of books and paper materials is authentic. In this modern era, many people like to write and share their feelings on the internet. Vividly, different people have different opinions and as a result, the information available on the internet is not evident. Therefore, students get incomplete information regarding a subject. However, in books the name of the author, publisher, and the source of context is original. Students enhance their learning through authentic concepts. Thus, increasing the value of true education for success. As a case in mind, 2 years ago, I was doing my final project assignment for Pharmacy graduation. I wrote an article from the information I obtained from Wikipedia. I failed that class when I saw my result. This was due to the incorrect information I used from the Internet. Had I consulted books, this would not have happened.
By perusing the above paragraphs, one can infer that although with the advent of technology, it has become convenient to educate ourselves, studying from paper material saves us from its flaws. For the sake of brevity, a couple of reasons are worth reiterating, first, reading from paper protects eyes and brain, secondly, it is an authentic source. As a writer, I vehemently urge people to decrease the use of electronic devices for studying and prefer printed books.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 348, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...by using electronic devices. As for the writers opinion, I subscribe to the idea of uti...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, as for, as a result, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2476.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 482.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13692946058 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85251225354 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5622406639 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 762.3 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.6003584229 155% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3100374324 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.375 100.406767564 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0625 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90625 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.88709677419 286% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163157443103 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0338476971683 0.076458572812 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557879189154 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101416757225 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555460390893 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.94 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 146.0 86.8835125448 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.