The reading passage and lecture talk about type of fungus called Phytophthora, which detected in forest of USA, these fungus infects trees and cause serious damage to oak trees. The author claims three methods to protect the forests. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article, she says all these methods to save oak trees are impractical.
First, the writer states, stope spreading of spores by washing hikers shoes or scrubbing bicycle. This point contradict by professor, she mention, washing shoes and scrubbing may decrease the spread of spores but not in amount that can decrease the infection with this fungus, because these spores spread by stream of water after the rain fell, it go far distance, therefore cleaning of bicycle or shoes dose not solve the problem.
Second, the author argues, using fungicidal can kill these species and prevent spreading of it to the surrounding area. This argument is reputed by professor, she states that fungicidal can stop the effect of fugus only few month, in addition we need to inject these chemicals directly in the stump of trees, this is may be can be effective with limited amount of trees in the city, but it is more difficult to inject a thousand and thousand trees in the forest.
Finally, the author, posts, clear-cutting of the area with infected trees can to burn the trees with the fungus and decrease the disease. The lecturer in the other hand refutes this suggestion, she illustrates to, burning infected trees can also burn healthy trees in the forest, moreover there are very rare trees in the forest that can burn and never grow again, hence burning diseased trees is impractical method to prevent spread of disease.
The reading passage and lecture talk about type of fungus called Phytophthora, which detected in forest of USA, these fungus infects trees and cause serious damage to oak trees. The author claims three methods to protect the forests. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article, she says all these methods to save oak trees are impractical.
First, the writer states, stope spreading of spores by washing hikers shoes or scrubbing bicycle. This point contradict by professor, she mention, washing shoes and scrubbing may decrease the spread of spores but not in amount that can decrease the infection with this fungus, because these spores spread by stream of water after the rain fell, it go far distance, therefore cleaning of bicycle or shoes dose not solve the problem.
Second, the author argues, using fungicidal can kill these species and prevent spreading of it to the surrounding area. This argument is reputed by professor, she states that fungicidal can stop the effect of fugus only few month, in addition we need to inject these chemicals directly in the stump of trees, this is may be can be effective with limited amount of trees in the city, but it is more difficult to inject a thousand and thousand trees in the forest.
Finally, the author, posts, clear-cutting of the area with infected trees can to burn the trees with the fungus and decrease the disease. The lecturer in the other hand refutes this suggestion, she illustrates to, burning infected trees can also burn healthy trees in the forest, moreover there are very rare trees in the forest that can burn and never grow again, hence burning diseased trees is impractical method to prevent spread of disease.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-24 | talelaldabous | 70 | view |
| 2021-03-24 | talelaldabous | 70 | view |
- The reading passage and the lecture are both about the accuracy of Chevalier de seingalt memoreis The critics in the reading passage claim that Chevalier distorted many events in the memoir therefore the author gives three reason to explain hes view Howev 75
- The passage and lecture are both about Chevalier de Seingalt life and the accuracy of his memoir Writer of passage arised doubts about the accurecy of the memoir lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article he says these memoirs are predictible and there 76
- The passing and lecturer are both about the ability of Pterosaurs of power flight The author claims Pterosaurs cannot power flight and he supports his claim by giving three evidences The lecturer casts doubt on the claim made in article She says no one of 60
- Education is a crucial thing in our life Good education makes a perfect future job Teachers are an essential part of the learning process Whether Teachers now a days are less respected by students than in the past or not This can be weighted in many aspec 63
- The passage and lecture are both about the purpose and meaning of carved stone balls which rae found in Scotland The writer claims three theories to elaborats on meaning and purpose of these stons The lecturer casts doubt on claims made in the articls She 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this fungus' or 'these fungi', 'these funguses'?
Suggestion: this fungus; these fungi; these funguses
...thora, which detected in forest of USA, these fungus infects trees and cause serious damage ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s three methods to protect the forests. The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in a...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ods to save oak trees are impractical. First, the writer states, stope spreadin...
^^^
Line 2, column 112, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'contradicts'.
Suggestion: contradicts
... shoes or scrubbing bicycle. This point contradict by professor, she mention, washing shoe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 141, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'mentions'.
Suggestion: mentions
...This point contradict by professor, she mention, washing shoes and scrubbing may decrea...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun month seems to be countable; consider using: 'few months'.
Suggestion: few months
...cidal can stop the effect of fugus only few month, in addition we need to inject these ch...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 434, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...more difficult to inject a thousand and thousand trees in the forest. Finally, the au...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sand and thousand trees in the forest. Finally, the author, posts, clear-cuttin...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l method to prevent spread of disease.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1977.66487455 71% => OK
No of words: 285.0 407.700716846 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95789473684 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42088990046 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543859649123 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 618.680645161 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.6003584229 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 104.409568645 48.9658058833 213% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 157.0 100.406767564 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6666666667 20.6045352989 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 5.45110844103 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.429103177343 0.236089414692 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.200661799003 0.076458572812 262% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.218334949213 0.0737576698707 296% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.293074623909 0.150856017488 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.306277883993 0.0645574589148 474% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 11.7677419355 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.