In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. What are the changes which have occurred? Do you think these changes are positive or negative.
In past there were large number of people in a family but now the size of the family have decreased due to the civilizations of society. People tend to be educated as the new technologies approaches and the gap between between families increased as people became more busy on their personal life. As far as i m concerned, the family structure has definitely changed and so does the roles of family. Family in recent years are more educated and compressed than it was in the past. The change in the family have both pros and cons.
First of all, in the past there was numerous people in the family which share the lovable bonds and gay. People used to have a jocund life as there was a venerable between family member but now the situation is different as there is a only few member in the family and people had to spend a loneliness. For example, I remember my big family having grandmother, grand father, uncle, aunt. We literally used to spend time together but now i barely spend my time with my parents as they are always busy in their work. Thus, in recent family there is a lack of a healthy bond between people as they are more busy on their professional life.
Secondly, educated people are found in today's family which was truant in past families. In recent families, people are broad-minded which helps to develop the nations and world. For an instance, in past people was narrow-minded many families does not allow girls to go to school as they thought girls were made for household works. However, recent families helps each other in building career and support each others occupations and morals. They are more educated morally and professionally.
Finally, people in the past had no contributions in building a healthy society and nations. People today have lot to offer to the world and nations as they are fully determined to achieve goals which not only uplift them but the nations also. People today let their children to choose their own profession as per their passion which help them to build their career and denote nation that pride.
In conclusion, although there is a lack in mirthful time to spend with family members as it was in the past families but there is a outcome of lots of positive impact from recent families in person's professional and successful life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: between
...new technologies approaches and the gap between between families increased as people became mor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vable bonds and gay. People used to have a jocund life as there was a venerable b...
^^
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... the situation is different as there is a only few member in the family and peopl...
^
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun member seems to be countable; consider using: 'few members'.
Suggestion: few members
...tuation is different as there is a only few member in the family and people had to spend a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...ch not only uplift them but the nations also. People today let their children to cho...
^^^^
Line 9, column 131, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...t was in the past families but there is a outcome of lots of positive impact from...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 9.8082437276 0% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1900.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 403.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71464019851 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52452824547 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45905707196 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 605.7 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8111866245 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2105263158 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224192995558 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904705873242 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697904799248 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14543290768 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733429855697 0.0645574589148 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.