Scientific developments in farming always bring major benefits. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Throughout history, scientific advances have considerable impacted the agriculture industry. An enormous number of farmers have changed their traditional methods in growing crops to modern approaches applying new technology. It is feasible to understand that using development of science in agriculture contributes to numerous significant advantages.
With the help of technology, farmers can easily boost the quality of crop production. For example, in the past, growing plants in extreme weather was hard or even impossible, when the crops barely survive under frosty wind or hot weather. To overcome this problem, farmers can employ some techniques such as using genetically modified crops. By adopting this method, not only does the strength of plants enhance, which leads to higher crop productivity, but they also can have a better taste.
Related to the health of the environment, the more modern technology using in farming, the less worrying about it. Since pollution rate is likely to increase, people tend to take advantage of organic products. When farmers exploit the results of biotechnology, making the use of biofertilizer instead of chemical fertilizer, they can dramatically limit chemical waste to pouring into rivers, sea, and groundwater. Moreover, thanks to the alternative of chemical fertilizer, customers might assure themselves of their health.
Economically, some people are of the opinion that modern developments in agriculture will make a number of farmers lose their jobs. However, it is different in reality. The advances in the area of science and technology may help farmers, especially those with bigger farms to reduce the need for workers. Despite this reducing, these workers can make use of scientific developments. For instance, farmers with small farms could plant more than one crop in their land. By adopting this technique, the result of some scientific researches in farming, they could not just save time of a growing season but improve the fertility of the soil.
Consequently, even though applying developments of science and technology in agriculture may bring some minor disadvantages, farmers should employ it in their work. By doing so, they could exploit many benefits, such as raising the quality of their products, decreasing the level of pollution, making more money.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, may, moreover, so, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1975.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 357.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53221288515 4.8611393121 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97385870099 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1781071694 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.947368421 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7894736842 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78947368421 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111597532413 0.236089414692 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.03398343423 0.076458572812 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0293172079903 0.0737576698707 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0619037824692 0.150856017488 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456021698548 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 11.7677419355 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 10.9000537634 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.