Many of us at least once in our life-time face the issue whether it is better to keep old or historical buildings or replace them with modern building, Which one would be more satisfying for us? Although some people prefer to replace building, I would definitely take a step back and preserve the old buildings. The reasons for which my prospect is based on will be discussed in detail below.
Firs and foremost, studying the historical building provides a steady flow of information. The concept of history is a cornerstone of today's society. In fact, we need this type of knowledge to sustain our life and without it we couldn't survive in contemporary realities. Furthermore, many of historical information depend on these old buildings.
Secondly, as the old saying goes "no risk, no reward", because successes often times accompany risks, there are less opportunities for rewards without risks, Take Egypt's pyramids for example, when i graduated from the university with bachelor's degree, I was faced with two choices. One was to study history through the books. The second was to study real historical places abroad without knowing the dangerous accompany with these places. It seemed like a gamble because it was possible that i will get killed over there. Wanting a better future, I chose to travel to Egypt's pyramids and in doing so I succeeded.
Lastly, from psychological aspects, historical places should contribute in building the person. As for society, preventing anyone from these places in any area and ignoring them in their most crucial conjuncture of life, will cause many problems. This notion may cause other problems such as depression, alienation and also ruin their self-confidence. I personally believe , this is not good for development of the society in the future, due to the fact that, visiting historical building and studying them are the chief motivators of the societies.
To summarize, the real situation necessitates wisdom to thoroughly weigh the pros and cons before jumping to destroy these buildings. As discussed above, I can safely come to the conclusion that keeping these places and preserve them is safer in making sure there is a higher chance of success. preserving historical building is more favorable since it is the most effective way to ensuring a higher success rate and will save people from undue troubles as well as assist them to prospect future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...e to sustain our life and without it we couldnt survive in contemporary realities. Furt...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun opportunities is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... often times accompany risks, there are less opportunities for rewards without risks...
^^^^
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ards without risks, Take Egypts pyramids for example, when i graduated from the u...
^^
Line 5, column 209, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...Take Egypts pyramids for example, when i graduated from the university with bach...
^
Line 5, column 504, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...e a gamble because it was possible that i will get killed over there. Wanting a b...
^
Line 7, column 373, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ir self-confidence. I personally believe , this is not good for development of the...
^^
Line 9, column 296, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Preserving
...re there is a higher chance of success. preserving historical building is more favorable s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, well, as for, as to, at least, for example, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2030.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 394.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15228426396 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83609169796 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571065989848 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4999010684 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.842105263 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7368421053 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.10526315789 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226375275881 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615095671812 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584920804811 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121891705468 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503211622826 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.