Should government spend money on improving roads and highways or should governments spend more money on improving public transportation (buses, trains, and subways)? Why? Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay.
Everyday every citizen uses some sources to commute and for this, of course, we have to use roads and so on. Everyday driver’s nerves stretch to the utmost for different reasons. First reason are roads which are condition is not enough satisfied and this is the reason to crashing cars. Secondly, car conditions not good enough. To have a healthy society, we call the government to reclaim roads.
Is the drivers’ robot? No. They are part of our society and we have to save their nervous system. Apart from the nervous system, there are also who drive for their work and they have to be quick. If the condition does not allow this then they could have no work which has really great consequences. Anyway to have the healthy and employed society we have to repair our roads.
Secondly, the entire world is developing and everyone attends to buy sport and expensive cars for themselves for several reasons. Nevertheless even buying really expensive cars will not provide you great conditions to survive. Vice versa you have to pay more and more because the roads will wreck all your cars system.
In conclusion, to make your society, government try to have roads that are nearly the same with standards.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: Every day
Everyday every citizen uses some sources to comm...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: Every day
...ourse, we have to use roads and so on. Everyday driver's nerves stretch to the utm...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...r their work and they have to be quick. If the condition does not allow this then ...
^^
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...ars for themselves for several reasons. Nevertheless even buying really expensive cars will ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, first, if, nevertheless, really, second, secondly, so, then, apart from, in conclusion, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 52.1666666667 40% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1017.0 1977.66487455 51% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 208.0 407.700716846 51% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88942307692 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 4.48103885553 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47457018412 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 212.727598566 56% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572115384615 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 618.680645161 50% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.6260000291 48.9658058833 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.6428571429 100.406767564 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8571428571 20.6045352989 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 5.45110844103 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.082688613312 0.236089414692 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0306502515374 0.076458572812 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039693668369 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0640190918834 0.150856017488 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041199888009 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.49 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 86.8835125448 43% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.