Should government spend more money on improving roads and highways, or on improving public transportation (buses, trains, subways)? Why? Use specific reasons to develop your essay.
Any government has a myriad of problems to solve to contribute to the development of the country they have manage. This way, the government has to ellaborate different programs to protect the environment and maitain economy. In my view, the financing of the improvement of public transportation can contirbute to the enhancing of these two pivotal spheres of life. I hold this opinion for a few reasons.
First of all, the improving of the public transportation will decrease expences of the citizent and therefore, increase their quality of life. For example, as a dweller of a small contry community, I know, that sometimes, people, who live in rural areas, have problems to commute to work or to other places. The public transportation simply lacks in such remout locations, and people have to have thie own veichles, which are quiet expensive. It espessially trtemendously affects the teenagers. To be clear, the teenagers have to start working while still being students to purchace a car. On the other hand, if the young people have public transportation available, they can save their money and contribute it to their education and excel. To that end, the investment of the government into the development of the public transportation in the country side will help young people to build the successful future.
Secondly, with the enhancing of the public transportation, the government can improve the environmental situation in the world. It is not a secret, that the enormous amount of private vechicles on the roads worldwide causes the global warming, which in turn, harms our planet. A myriad of species today are at risk of disappearing because of the climate change. When people have buses or subway available, especially in the big cities, they very often tend to decrease the use of their own cars in order to avoid traffic problems and save the priceless time. Therefore, the amount of the carbone dioxide in the atmosphere, which is the major cause of the global warming, could be reduced. As you see, by the improvement of the public transportation, the government has a chance to protect our planed from declining.
To conclude, I storngly believe that the government should spend more money on improving public transportation. This is because it will contribute to the economical satisfaction of the citizens and will help our planet thrive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'managed'.
Suggestion: managed
...he development of the country they have manage. This way, the government has to ellabo...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 534, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s in order to avoid traffic problems and save the priceless time. Therefore, the ...
^^
Line 3, column 672, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s the major cause of the global warming, could be reduced. As you see, by the imp...
^^
Line 4, column 218, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of the citizens and will help our planet thrive.
^^
Line 4, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...izens and will help our planet thrive.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, first of all, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.0752688172 285% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1983.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 388.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11082474227 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02844044613 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505154639175 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5472371001 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.368421053 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4210526316 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94736842105 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230127437043 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690579229614 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842140255028 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147306975188 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335324734022 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.