Without transportation and road, every way to travel will be blocked, which limits the all experiences and what we gain from traveling. There is also a controversial question on whether the government should spend bunch of money on road and highways or on public transportation, I believe that it is more efficient to encourage the transportation more than the roads. Regardless of how important the roads on every transportation, the most public ones have their own ways to use.
To begin with, because the own transportation objects such as car and plane is not affordable for everyone, most people use the public transportation in their daily life instead. Moreover, it will probably decrease the population of cars and help to solve the problems associated with overcrowded city roads and parking. Many people like to catch up the public transportation because of its a lot of advantages: it is cheaper and quicker than others, also comfortable for long roads. As an illustration, in my country, we have especial route for the bus that encourages it to take less time than usual cars and also its cost does not count by kilometers like taxis.
Furthermore, if the system of public transportation will improved well, the roads will become quieter and peaceful that attract more tourists than before. By mentioning this, I could say that the improvement of the public transportation will lead the growth of the country's economy immediately. Besides, it will become the signature of the country which will help it to get assistance from other or encourage it to be advertise them free. For example, we imagine the United States by its popular items such as fast food. Many visit there because they have the modern technologies in their transportation system. Also, the fast food widespread throughout the world because it appeals the tourists when they visit the United States.
All in all, because the public transportation has many great impacts on the nation itself and its economy, I think it is far better too encourage it rather than roads and highways that are not beneficial at all. In addition, from my point of view, the pros of encouraging the public transportation considerably outweigh the cons of it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...up the public transportation because of its a lot of advantages: it is cheaper and ...
^^^
Line 5, column 58, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'improve'
Suggestion: improve
...he system of public transportation will improved well, the roads will become quieter and...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 522, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun visit seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many visits'.
Suggestion: Many visits
...by its popular items such as fast food. Many visit there because they have the modern tech...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 732, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ists when they visit the United States. All in all, because the public transport...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 133, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to encourage'?
Suggestion: to encourage
...d its economy, I think it is far better too encourage it rather than roads and highways that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, for example, i think, in addition, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1857.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 368.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04619565217 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01668010781 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535326086957 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.097991083 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.8 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5333333333 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185480158126 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638330101903 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852637944986 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116451541875 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812228990256 0.0645574589148 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.