Is it prudent to say that parents shouldn't punish their kids...? Two diverse perspectives surface while meticulously evaluating this issue. One perspective answers the aforementioned question in the affirmative with utmost conviction whereas the other perspective makes its disapproval evident by denying its acquiescence. Personally, I have a proclivity towards the other perspective that children shouldn't be punished.
Every child is different and not every child understands everything after convincing to do right things after mistakes. Some might remain as stubborn as rock and while some might understand as early as possible. In case of stubborn child, mild punishment will create psychology of not making more mistakes. This might help teenagers to keep them on track. But parents should punish their children when they have gown up. For example by considering age factor above 18 age children are capable of taking their own decisions and they can think about right and wrong side of coins. One research shows hat parents who punishes their kids of legal age, there are more chances that children choose wrong side and leave their parents. Whereas when parents punishes their kids by not using mental and physical harassment, there are more chances of being successful in future.
Some parents hit their kids by stick or any similar things this might leave scar on innocent minds for their whole life. Punishments like social service, cleaning their own room or garden or doing their laundry on their own, will generate feeling of guilt and this feeling in enough for behaving as well as doing right in the future. Every parents should build a healthy relation with their kids then by parents words only the kid will understand about his mistakes. This will not bring distance in relations.
Hence after a holistic analysis, it is evident that the points in favor of the thought that children should not be punished overpower the points in favor of children should be punished with its logic, cogency and rationale
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
Is it prudent to say that parents shouldnt punish their kids...? Two diverse persp...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 367, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sonally, I have a proclivity towards the other perspective that children shouldnt...
^^
Line 1, column 401, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...ds the other perspective that children shouldnt be punished. Every child is differe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'doing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'convince' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: doing
...understands everything after convincing to do right things after mistakes. Some might...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 693, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to wrong'
Suggestion: to wrong
...e are more chances that children choose wrong side and leave their parents. Whereas ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 859, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...re are more chances of being successful in future. Some parents hit their kids by sti...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...den or doing their laundry on their own, will generate feeling of guilt and this ...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ll not bring distance in relations. Hence after a holistic analysis, it is eviden...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, then, well, whereas, while, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1706.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 328.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2012195122 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56804338308 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545731707317 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6637173776 48.9658058833 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.352941176 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2941176471 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.17647058824 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297211387224 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999785078203 0.076458572812 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0902832931606 0.0737576698707 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178070786077 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590593338242 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.