Some companies like to employ younger and enthusiastic people; other companies like to employ older and experienced people. If you were a boss, whom kind of people do you like to employ. Give reasons and specific examples to illustrate your answer.
Human resources and hiring section of any company is its most important part, since it decides the policy of company about recruitment of new staff. A number of companies like to hire more experienced people for their firm. However, a few others believe that hiring from young generation can benefit them more efficiently. I think hiring young talented people can help any company due to some reasons which I am going to illustrate below.
First, young graduated people can assist the firm which they are hired to keep itself up to date with recent advanced technological developments. Because, they were just finished their academic studies with most recent methods that can be shared with companies’ older staff to orchestrate the developing of the company coherently.
Secondly, fresh minds of young specialists can push the company toward novel areas which can expand the company’s fields of expertise which may lead to new markets that can increase the total revenues of the firm increasingly. For example, I have worked in a pharmaceutical office where they mostly focus their sales on common drugs. But, after changing their recruitment plan in managerial board, they gradually started to hire and interview with young ambitious engineers whom they hired a number of them. Eventually, these new folks fundamentally altered the strategy of the company by proposing them to sell natural drugs beside their main products. This increased the company’s incomes by 50 percent in less than a year that is directly assessed to be due to the addition new line of products.
Last but not least, any successful company or research faculty should have feasible long term plans and strategies for their future business. Hiring young people with brilliant ideas have the ability to fulfill this hypothesis for any firm. As, they inject the company with science changes and challenges which can assist them to thrive together. Whereas, if they accept older experienced people, they may be not as enthusiastic as younger ones to lead the company in a right direction, since they have achieved anything they wanted during their long time of work.
In conclusion, accepting new persons in any company can be controversial. Some may prefer experienced safe choices. However, some others may like to try hiring a young generation. These reasons I mentioned above clearly indicated the obvious benefits of using younger people who can garentee a company’s future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, whereas, for example, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2088.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 396.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27272727273 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81030995745 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563131313131 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5416666181 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.894736842 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8421052632 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16621348829 0.236089414692 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627813871238 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485479867409 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1121900388 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476113851403 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.