Recently, general awareness about whether it is wise to regulate smoking in buildings and public places has aroused heated arguments. People, nevertheless have conflicting ideas. While some people, especially heavy smokers oppose this rule while others say this restriction is will benefit public health. In my opinion, this rule is advisable because
First of all, smoking threats other people's health. Smoke from cigarettes contain highly addictive and carcinogenic material such as tar, carbon dioxide, nicotine and much more. The smoke does not only affect the smoker but other people who ingest the smoke as well. Smoking in public could be dangerous since it puts other people's health at risk. According to a research conducted by Australia National University, involuntary smoking could be more dangerous because they do not receive protection from cigarette filters. Also, in public places, there are children who are not allowed to smoke and also more susceptible to smoking. Furthermore, cigarette smoke could be fatal to children's undeveloped lungs. Not only that, smoking in public could affect children as they want to imitate adult's behavior.
Moreover, smoking can cause fire. Many smokers are unaware of the risk of discarded cigarettes. Actually, according to a research, the number of fires in America caused by discarded cigarettes has reached 1000 in 2017. Also, in public parks and forests, a single dead cigarette could cause irreversible disaster to the whole natural ecosystem.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, while, such as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 43.0788530466 21% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 52.1666666667 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1280.0 1977.66487455 65% => OK
No of words: 232.0 407.700716846 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51724137931 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.48103885553 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66338854198 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 212.727598566 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.629310344828 0.524837075471 120% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 618.680645161 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8574957296 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.3333333333 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4666666667 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 5.45110844103 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179140188348 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603341887096 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436674208638 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114024026418 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560090962539 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.