Some high school teachers (teachers of students ages 14-18) spend most of their class time lecturing (speaking) while their students listen and take notes. Other high school teachers spend most of their class time on discussions and projects that require students to participate by sharing their ideas with the class. Which of these two approaches do you think is more effective for students learning, and why?
In the purview of the prodigy person, there is nothing as a mainstay to boost and pioneer to dispel a problem wholeheartedly. In the similar fashion, no doubt it can be said as we have to reach to the optimum solution rather than others. In consideration of this view in case of solving the problems of students in the classroom, the optimum solution, which I deem is discussion and projects based class. That's why, I wholeheartedly opine in the second aspect of the above statement as a optimum solution. Therefore, I will try with might and main to hold up some logic to substantiate the second point as a proper choice.
To embark on, in study we have to perceive the inner gist of a concept which is not possible in case of traditional class because we all know in such type traditional room students only stare at t
he eye of the teacher and not to give them opportunity to solve their problem if any exist. However in such type class are the reciprocal of the notion of live class. Especially, when teachers and students partake in the discussion about a concept, it is sure that students will reach at the inner corner of their fruition. For instance, in my second year of Mechanical Engineering Design class, our teachers at first discussed a concept and threw the concept on the sky. As a result all the students started group study and discussed among them. Whenever they feel that there is lack in their understanding , thjey above all asked the professor many types of intricate and labyrinth question. Besides, students were very eager to relate those things with their personal projects which is the best option for gaining aplomb in their mind which eventually worked as a fuel to understand the subject deeply.
In addition, we can't but depict the usefulness of sharing knowledge with others. What I mean by this is that we have to depend on the lecture and notes in the class and for exam. But, if there are any scopes of dispersing knowledge via sharing, it will be a great one. From my personal experience, I was very weak in chemistry at school. In that situation sharing views of others concepts functioned as s tonic to be intelligible of this topic. Especially my five friends helped me a lot after finishing the main theory class and we discussed the every things together which is a way to embellish my chemistry knocking in the class eight.
Last but not least, surely practical knowledge is the element to reach our perception into the long distant and will finally capture the innerness of this topic. For example, after finishing our theory classes, we all go to the lab in order to convince the main point and project based knowledge of that concept. I can remember a situation, we had to make a builder machine, the concept we use heat exchanger by which it was possible to make a perfect machine. But, it is not our credit fully as our system taught us how to implement theoretical knowledge in project work.
To wrap it up, it is very onerous to provide solution of this open ended question. So although some may oppose my view, it is clear that without practical and deeper understanding in case of study it is very hard to materialize the progress of the students in this aspect. Moreover, only through traditional lecture based class is not conducive to quench the thirst of student's knowledge, rather it is very a decimated way to stop the flow of creativeness of the students. That's why; it will be the utmost one if we focus on discussion based class.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 239, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...he optimum solution rather than others. In consideration of this view in case of s...
^^
Line 1, column 406, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...is discussion and projects based class. Thats why, I wholeheartedly opine in the seco...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 487, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...second aspect of the above statement as a optimum solution. Therefore, I will try...
^
Line 4, column 93, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ty to solve their problem if any exist. However in such type class are the reciprocal o...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 608, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...hat there is lack in their understanding , thjey above all asked the professor man...
^^
Line 6, column 17, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...the subject deeply. In addition, we cant but depict the usefulness of sharing kn...
^^^^
Line 8, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., after finishing our theory classes, we all go to the lab in order to convince t...
^^
Line 10, column 474, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...e flow of creativeness of the students. Thats why; it will be the utmost one if we fo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i mean, in addition, no doubt, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 100.0 52.1666666667 192% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2887.0 1977.66487455 146% => OK
No of words: 619.0 407.700716846 152% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66397415186 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.98795655647 4.48103885553 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68070678474 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 297.0 212.727598566 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479806138934 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 897.3 618.680645161 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3045954966 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.038461538 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8076923077 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76923076923 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18779233694 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495632230118 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505154247809 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0911406997594 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0803123083216 0.0645574589148 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 86.8835125448 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.