Some high schools require all students to wear school uniforms. Other high schools permit students to decide what to wear to school. Which of these two school policies do you think is better? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
Having the choice to wear what one prefers to school may have its advantages but according to me wearing school uniforms to school is the better option. I feel this way for many reasons which I have explained in the subsequent paragraphs.
School uniforms ensure a common dress code for all students and thus ensures that there is no discrimination among them. A school may accommodate students from various financial backgrounds. Due to this some students may be able to afford better clothing than others which would lead to making the less fortunate students feel inferior. I must mention that my opinion is profoundly influenced by my personal experience. My high school initially allowed students to wear clothing per their choice. My close friend who was from a financially unstable background due to the death of the earning member in her family often felt uncomfortable to hang out with our social group as most of them dressed pretty in a sophisticated way. She was often teased for her cheap clothing to such an extent that she did not want to attend school. From this experience I clearly understood that a choice in clothing may in fact discourage many students from pursuing education or even be a part of social events in high school.
Another important point to consider is that students often misuse their freedom of attire. Girls may wear extremely short skirts and sleeveless tops while boys may wear short pants and informal shirts. This strictly opposes the ethics of a school. Here, it often becomes difficult to impose, follow and maintain the rules regarding the dress code in school. For example, in my cousin's school their were a group of students who frequently challenged their teachers by breaking the dress code. In spite of several warnings the girls wore sleeveless tops and hid them by wearing jackets only in front of the faculties and removing it thereafter. Boys also dressed in weirdly colourful shirts and short pants which were certainly unfit for as formal school attires. Clearly through this example we can see that allowing students to wear their choice of attire would pose a threat to the integrity and principles of the high schools.
Therefore, I strongly support high schools with the policy of compulsory uniforms for all students. I feel so as mentioned above that students must not be discouraged due to their attire and secondly, that uniforms would make it easier to ensure that students are dressed in a civilised manner.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 240, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...his some students may be able to afford better clothing than others which would lead t...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 650, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ily often felt uncomfortable to hang out with our social group as most of them dr...
^^
Line 3, column 705, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a sophisticated way" with adverb for "sophisticated"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...al group as most of them dressed pretty in a sophisticated way. She was often teased for her cheap clo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1011, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a part of social events in high school. Another important point to consider is t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, as for, for example, i feel, in fact, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2068.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 416.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97115384615 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61496037283 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528846153846 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0047497493 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.4 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393987862408 0.236089414692 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128341103181 0.076458572812 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0936965330576 0.0737576698707 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262697527753 0.150856017488 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034648605199 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.