Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why?

The modern technology has many impacts on the present generation. The millenia is filled with internet and technology. It certainly has it's own positives and negatives. Though parents controlling their children not to use smart phones has valid reasons, we can't completely remove smart phones from the current generation children's life. So, in my opinion, children should be allowed to use the smart phones with parents' monitoring.

First, as any other modern technology, smart phones also has many positives and negatives. To talk about negatives, the internet is replete with malicious contents and fradulent events which targets the new users. For example, in the modern era, the dark net has become a platform for luring the adolescents into all shady acctions like weapon trading and drug dealing. Young children are very prone to such attacks because of their incognizant stage of life. They are not aware of it's consequences in a long time effect neither on health by using the drugs nor about the addictivity it causes. As adults, parents understands these things and afraid of the potential traps in real world which leads them to completely forbid the smart phones for their children.

In addition to the harmful things from internet, the smart phone usage makes the young children to get addicted to it's usage in the forms of games and videos. For example, parents are in a need to hand over the phones to their toddlers in order to feed them. This kind of activities may give a short term relief but holistically it affects a children's body activities. They may get addictive to the colorful screens and not participate in any body activities like playing, learning and developing interest on other curricular activities.

Even though there are such negatives, there are equivalent positive sides to the smart phones. The children can be independent on thier own and at the same time parents can be in touch with them all the time. Reaching out a person is not at all an issue in the modern times because of the various mediums like WhatsApp, Telegram along with normal calls. And addition with that, learning is an essential usage of the smart phones. Students can watch the seminar or lectures anywhere anytime and be consistent with learning. Apart from school or college seminars, internet is abundant with external resources to learn and exceed in any field.

In summary, though parents know the negative sides of smart phones, they should also consider the positive things that provides to the young society. They should teach and warn their children about both pros and cons, and let them explore the advantages. And occasional monitoring on their smart phone usage would not hurt their freedom through which parents can also get some peace on their children safety over modern technology.

Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 258, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... use smart phones has valid reasons, we cant completely remove smart phones from the...
Line 5, column 440, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'anybody'?
Suggestion: anybody
...colorful screens and not participate in any body activities like playing, learning and d...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, apart from, for example, in addition, in summary, kind of, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2355.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 466.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05364806867 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53254616668 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508583690987 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 723.6 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2103396249 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.125 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4166666667 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.29166666667 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288350544168 0.236089414692 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799902940355 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556544249919 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172197019367 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439917229068 0.0645574589148 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.