A contoversy is often raised sbout the elegibility of people who attend universities
Some groups of people hold the view that higher education should be limited to good performers. Others may have an opposing view and feel that higher education is a right for everybody. From my vantage point . I concur with the later groups of people for two primary reasons that I address in this Essay
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that education is not a right for a small group of people. In fact, education is a right for everybody including good and bad, white and black, male and female. If we limit education to only small group of people, we are withholding others from this right. A vivid example which illustrate my point is that education was limited to only few number of oeople when I have graduated. Thus, many of my colleagues did not receive higher education.
Second, the aforementioned reason is by no mean the only reason that crosses my mind at a glance. In fact, another subtle Point which is worth to be mentioned is the result of a study which showed that providing education to a vast grouo of students comtribute significantly to reduce poverty. This study was conducted on the less fortunate families to see the impact on this group of people.
To wrap up, contemplating all the aforementioned reason one soon realizes the importance of providing education to all classes of the comunity. Without such an approach we are enhacimg poverty and have a double standards.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 209, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ght for everybody. From my vantage point . I concur with the later groups of peopl...
^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'few numbers'.
Suggestion: few numbers
...t is that education was limited to only few number of oeople when I have graduated. Thus, ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'standard'?
Suggestion: standard
... are enhacimg poverty and have a double standards.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, so, thus, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 43.0788530466 49% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1241.0 1977.66487455 63% => OK
No of words: 258.0 407.700716846 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81007751938 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77130797295 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 212.727598566 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538759689922 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 618.680645161 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6283593377 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4615384615 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53846153846 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224759604521 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746650860182 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701331012302 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116892248239 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697773723553 0.0645574589148 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 86.8835125448 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
More content wanted.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.