Some people believe that earth is being harmed by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the earth better. What is your opinion?
While majority of humans proclaim that human activities have positive impact on the earth, they are still some people who refute this opinion by contending that in fact, humans damage the Earth. From my perspective, humans have tremendous effect on earth, most of which is disadvantageous. I maintain this statement for three prime reasons, which I will elucidate in the following essay in depth.
First and foremost, humans affect the environment of the earth negatively by polluting seas, rivers and alike. According to research conducted by prominent scientists, it became evident that indeed, eighty-five % of the pollution is caused by humans. Furthermore, this pollution influences earth by tearing its ozone layer, which might lead to global warming. In addition to ozone layer, people also annihilate trees in order to build infrastructure or enhance agriculture, and trees are pivotal for humans to inhale recommended oxygen. Moreover, if the number of trees is going to get reduced, it will render a myriad of people to die, not to mention animals. Thus, human activities have negative impact on Earth’s environment.
Secondly, human beings not only harm the environment of the earth, but they also, as I asserted above, cause reduction of animals by eradicating their habitats, which are crucial for them to keep living. Every year array of animals is becoming endangered, as well as extinct, due to human activities. The infrastructures humans construct instead of the habitats of animals are also affecting human health negatively for they emit significant amount of gases, which engender decrement of oxygen in the atmosphere.
Thirdly, infrastructures, as well as factories, are not only sources which emit harmful gasses. The development in agriculture led to increment of greenhouses, which cause gas emissions, and those gas emissions damage atmosphere.
In conclusion, I would like to accentuate that humans have to determine feasible solutions to this problem, and while doing this they have to ignore economical income, which is the main reason why we harm our planet Earth.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, thus, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 329.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40121580547 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99672456638 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58358662614 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6405989327 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.466666667 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9333333333 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4 5.45110844103 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295214696466 0.236089414692 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1022648503 0.076458572812 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.096270116042 0.0737576698707 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157759491496 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0925048250105 0.0645574589148 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 10.9000537634 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.01818996416 124% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.