Some people believe that electing a constitutional assembly is the best way to address modifications to the constitution, while others believe that a group of experts should be responsible for this task.
One of the mains demands of the Chilean mobilization is the creation of a new constitution. In order to do this, it is not enough that a group of experts develop the task, actually electing a constitutional assembly is the best way to address modifications to the constitution. The main two reasons are the following.
A constitutional assembly is an opportunity of legitimate rendering of the citizens in democracy. In Chile there has been a crisis in the political representativeness and the political class is far away from the necessity of the majority. This can be seen in the results of the transparency study where the poll shows that 91% of the Chileans don’t have or almost don’t have trust in the politics to solve the problems of the country. As a matter of fact, 54% of the citizens think that an constitutional assembly is the best way to achieve a constitutional change. Therefore the conformation of an assembly can be an opportunity to recover the representativeness through the election of its own delegates. And this connects with the next argument.
With the constitutional assembly the citizens can start a process of civic education and participation that can help to soothe the discontentment. In this context this kind of process are meaningful, at least this is seen for example, in the formation of town meetings, convened in different parts of the country with vast participation, that has channeled this needs to discuss problems related to the social discontent. Also the self-managed education has become relevant in the last weeks. For example, one of the book most sold in these weeks was the Chilean constitution so a lot of people, including myself, are doing research and making responsible about the civic and constitutional education. In my personal experience this reflection is making me feel better and more quiet about the crisis when its put in some formal or informal assemblies or ways of discussions.
For all the arguments given above electing a constitutional assembly is the best way to address modifications to the constitution due to the opportunity to recover the representativeness and to soothe the social discontentment through the opening to a process of civil education and participation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 498, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...of fact, 54% of the citizens think that an constitutional assembly is the best way...
^^
Line 5, column 577, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...way to achieve a constitutional change. Therefore the conformation of an assembly can be ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 423, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...blems related to the social discontent. Also the self-managed education has become r...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, if, so, therefore, at least, for example, kind of, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1904.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 368.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17391304348 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45309232219 2.67179642975 129% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483695652174 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 599.4 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.2172187269 48.9658058833 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.933333333 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5333333333 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306141805366 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947035021971 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105741005004 0.0737576698707 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202500893028 0.150856017488 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662806783425 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.