Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect in your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
* Interrupt and correct the mistake right away
* Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader
* Say nothing
In my opinion I would point out in the same meeting or during the class, the mistake made by the person right away. I feel this way for two main reasons that I will explain in the following essay.
First, I think it is important to state a correct concept if someone have said something I know is wrong. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. Approximately 10 years ago, I remember being in a history class and my teacher was talking about World War II. I noticed he said wrong a specific date. Moreover, he continued explaining the timeline of the facts based on this. When I noticed that something was wrong, I did not need to think so much, and I just rise my hand and told him he was confused the year and which was correct. As a result, all my classmates could learn properly the topic as well as my teacher was glad that I pointed out for him.
Second, it is a good way for the teacher or a boss could noticed you are aware of the lesson or the subject being discussed in the meeting. For instance, when I was working for a marketing business, I needed some feedback from my coworkers. The way I as leader, was able to know whereas they understand the presentation being exposed, occurred when one told me I was wrong. After that, everyone realized it was OK to talk out loud in a secure environment. Therefore, they assume it is correct to quickly discuss incorrect thoughts.
In conclusion, it is fine to tell a teacher or a group leader when they have made an error. This is because all the others present can correct the fail and because it allow having a respectful interchange of ideas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...t to state a correct concept if someone have said something I know is wrong. My pers...
^^^^
Line 5, column 58, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'notice'
Suggestion: notice
...ood way for the teacher or a boss could noticed you are aware of the lesson or the subj...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 168, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'allows'?
Suggestion: allows
...ent can correct the fail and because it allow having a respectful interchange of idea...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, whereas, for instance, i feel, i think, in conclusion, talking about, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 52.1666666667 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 1977.66487455 67% => OK
No of words: 300.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.42333333333 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5615338287 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 618.680645161 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5270755846 48.9658058833 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.9375 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 5.45110844103 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135816714253 0.236089414692 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435024411268 0.076458572812 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529830847621 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.091436910482 0.150856017488 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522469670377 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 11.7677419355 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.36 10.9000537634 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 86.8835125448 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.