Since the industrial revolution, technology has brought tremendous changes to people's lives. Hundreds of thousands new inventions are created every year. In this ever-changing world, my perspective is that the ability to adapt or adjust to a changing condition or circumstance is more important than having excellent knowledge of a job or in a field of study.
To begin with, an increasing number of people are beginning to realize that learning is not complete with graduation since the industry is changing rapidly. The people who are willing to learn new things, their skills will grow over time. They understand how to grapple problems with new invented tools. For instance, to sell a smartphone, what some experts think of is how to improve the hardware performance of the product in order to get attention from the customer. However, other experts develop from the essential needs of the user; they combine the good hardware performance with the interesting software applications and received the great acclaim worldwide. Therefore, cultivating new skills is beneficial to us to get success.
Additionally, learning knowledge in different fields will spur one’s interest. With cross-disciplinary skills, these people are able to propose better solutions to employers or clients. Their aggressive attitude on study can lay a solid foundation for climbing the career ladder. As a result, they can be the competitive candidates and stand out from the crowd in labor market.
There is no doubt that the people who have the excellent knowledge in a field and can clarify the issues in a short time would be the valuable asserts in a company. Nonetheless, if these experts cannot continue to maintain their peers with modern knowledge, their advantages would decrease as time goes by.
In sum, people must accumulate more knowledge, cultivate a wider range of skills, techniques and learn how to deal with new changes effectively. The active attitude on study new tools and acquire cross-disciplinary ability are conducive to one’s potential to adjust to a changing condition.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nonetheless, so, therefore, for instance, no doubt, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 331.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32326283988 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03353954225 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577039274924 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1640607955 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.647058824 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4705882353 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35294117647 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239855871351 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647881199039 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773913186209 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126197421379 0.150856017488 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0890437869833 0.0645574589148 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 10.9000537634 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.