Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to schoolwork, which of the two approaches do you prefer
Over the past few years, the issue of whether busy parents, who do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, is better to spend their limited time playing and having fun with their children or it is the best to use that time for doing school works with their children has received a great deal of attention from parents and psychologists. Although some may say that children's education is crucial, and parents should use any chances to improve it; I, as well as many others, believe that it is better to have fun in that time because of the importance of the child's relation with their parents and its effect on their mood.
First of all, an important reason why it is better for busy parents to have fun playing games or sports in the free time with their children is that these activities could enhance the mood condition of the children. Many psychologists say that playing and spending time with parents could have different influences than playing with friends and peers. Therefore, children need to experience this feeling to have a happy life, and it is recommended to parents to at least play with their children even for just some moments in a day.
A further reason why busy parents must spend their limited time on having fun with their children is that it could fortify their relationships with them. It is commonly mentioned that the type of the parents' behaviors has varied effects on their relationship with their children. For example, when parents are doing school works with their child, the child could not feel really bond and emotionally close to the parents. Therefore, parents should show their affection to their children by playing and having fun with them, and it could be more important for busy parents who spend less time with their children.
Finally, it is occasionally said that it is better for parents to spend their free time on having fun with their children because children's education is better to be limited to schools these days. Due to the constant development of the societies, the education system has become so sophisticated, and teachers are well aware of the students need for their educational improvements and could monitor the whole of their education process without the help of the parents. Consequently, parents do not need to be involved in their children school work matters, and it is better for them to enjoy their limited free time with their children.
To sum up, considering the ideas presented in the paragraphs above, I personally believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports rather than doing things that are related to school work chiefly due to the influence of these activities on the children's mood and relationship with their parents and the independency of education system.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, if, may, really, so, therefore, well, at least, for example, as well as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2373.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 494.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8036437247 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53869801764 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.378542510121 0.524837075471 72% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 694.8 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 20.1344086022 189% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.3275337397 48.9658058833 182% => OK
Chars per sentence: 182.538461538 100.406767564 182% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.0 20.6045352989 184% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.69230769231 5.45110844103 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.505992673185 0.236089414692 214% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.248906613746 0.076458572812 326% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141816598403 0.0737576698707 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.383819294565 0.150856017488 254% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137717677104 0.0645574589148 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.2 11.7677419355 172% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.83 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.1575268817 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 26.5 10.002688172 265% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.0537634409 171% => OK
text_standard: 27.0 10.247311828 263% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, if, may, really, so, therefore, well, at least, for example, as well as, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2373.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 494.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8036437247 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53869801764 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.378542510121 0.524837075471 72% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 694.8 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 20.1344086022 189% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.3275337397 48.9658058833 182% => OK
Chars per sentence: 182.538461538 100.406767564 182% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.0 20.6045352989 184% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.69230769231 5.45110844103 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.505992673185 0.236089414692 214% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.248906613746 0.076458572812 326% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141816598403 0.0737576698707 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.383819294565 0.150856017488 254% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137717677104 0.0645574589148 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.2 11.7677419355 172% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.83 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.1575268817 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 26.5 10.002688172 265% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.0537634409 171% => OK
text_standard: 27.0 10.247311828 263% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.