Some people like to buy and eat their meals at restaurants frequently while others like to do this at home. Which do you prefer? Why?

Essay topics:

Some people like to buy and eat their meals at restaurants frequently while others like to do this at home. Which do you prefer? Why?

Throughout history, food has played a prominent role in all societies. Because it is of paramount importance, many people have always searched for many ways to enhance food quality. Whether or not people either prefer to consume their meals at restaurants or prefer to cook their food at home is controversial. I content that cooking food at home has several advantageous points. In the following paragraph, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons.

The first important factor to be mentioned is that human would improve their health condition by preparing healthy food. To elaborate on my point, when human want to cook food, they would try to find organic and fresh materials so that they buy some fresh meat, vegetables and many other materials that need for cooking food. Also, These people cook their food base on their taste and interest. In this situation, they have options for food. Consider a person who wants to become healthy, for instance. She tries to cook food with low salt and oil. She would able to consumes some boiled food instead of fried food with a lot of oil. But, at restaurants, cook makers may not use fresh and organic materials, because it makes their food becomes a high price, and many people cannot buy them. Furthermore, they are having many costumers so that they must cook delicious food. In this situation, they are using a lot of salt and oil for cooking their food. Consuming a lot of oil and salt make hard diseases such as heart attack and blood pressure. Indeed, it is better people eat their meal at home.

Another reason which deserves some words here is that eating food at home improve the relationship among family members at home. To shed more light on this matter, since people have a hectic lifestyle, family members may not have adequate time for speaking and talking with each other. When their mother cooks their meal at home, they would able to spend beneficial times with themselves at the meal table. Family members can make a fun time, and also they able to speak about their problem at this time so that they make a strong bond with others. Conversely, if a person eats a meal at a restaurant, she may not find time to connect with their family members.

All in all, considering the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that eating and cooking food at home have several merits point. I believe that family members who try to cook food at home not only improve their health but also improve the relationship in their family.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'Whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: Whether
... for many ways to enhance food quality. Whether or not people either prefer to consume their m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 663, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e to connect with their family members. All in all, considering the aforemention...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, furthermore, if, may, so, for instance, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2112.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 436.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84403669725 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42621417736 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490825688073 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 628.2 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2580004126 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1666666667 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.20833333333 5.45110844103 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237618061967 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0893037907595 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0962910160264 0.0737576698707 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176481346976 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484534515239 0.0645574589148 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.