Some people like to keep a record of their own experiences by uploading pictures and other information to social networking sites Other people prefer not to create such records Which approach do you prefer and why Use specific reasons and examples to supp

Nowadays, the advent of internet and social media has played a vital role in everybody's lives living in the society. Some people believe that it is not a good idea to post your personal records on the internet. I, personally, on the other hand, think that uploading photos or other things to social media has some benefits making it worthwhile to do so. I feel this way for two significant reasons which I will explore in the following paragraphs.
First of all, when we keep our memories somewhere in online platforms, we can enjoy it more by looking at them or remembering the past events experienced by us. Our memory is a tricky one forgetting special events once experienced in the past. For instance, when I was studying in high school, we went on a trip hold by students. We had a lot of fun and entertainment convinced us to repeat the expedition again too. I posted the photos taken by friends and me in my personal social networking account to remember those good old days in the future. Hence, when I take a look at them now, I feel those excitement and great times we had together. Had not uploaded them on the internet, I could not have remembered them today after a couple of years gone by. This example shows how it is preferable to use this online tools as a memory tool to avoid forgetting good moments we had someday.
Last but not least, we usually tend to forget the details of events and special days we experienced before. This is because our brain focuses on one thing at a time which makes it difficult to concentrate on more thing simultaneously. By posting our own experiences on social media sites like Instagram, Twitter, TikTak and so on, we can take advantage of and bring almost every detail we can not focus on. My personal example is a good illustration of this concept. I once used to go to cinema to see movies with my colleagues. We talked a lot and had meals afterwards. But, after a couple of months, I usually didn't remember the details of our talking or films we saw. So, I decided to post some of the videos taken there by me and my counterparts, and it turned out to work for me. Because I was able to keep the most important nuisances in our speaking or main ones of the movies. If I had not kept them through social channels, I would not have been able to preserve those crucial nuisances today.
To put it all in a nutshell, although some may hold the opposite view, I prefer to make use of social media websites and applications to keep a record of my own memories. Not only does it provide a place to help remember our experiences and feel them when watched, but it also holds the details forgotten easily afterwards.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 596, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this excitement' or 'those excitements'?
Suggestion: this excitement; those excitements
... when I take a look at them now, I feel those excitement and great times we had together. Had no...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 612, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ut, after a couple of months, I usually didnt remember the details of our talking or ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 693, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... or films we saw. So, I decided to post some of the videos taken there by me and my counter...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, look, may, so, while, for instance, i feel, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 69.0 43.0788530466 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2182.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 488.0 407.700716846 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47131147541 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64149121008 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516393442623 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 700.2 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2927878409 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9166666667 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154100137301 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.040692445817 0.076458572812 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538715804948 0.0737576698707 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113930542599 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614610093897 0.0645574589148 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 10.9000537634 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.