Education is one of the most important parts of our life, enabling us to harvest knowledge, get many abilities, and locate our careers. The studying environment guides the quality of our study. It’s accustomed to learning that individuals are frequently trapped in conflict with inner contradiction, thus it’s reasonable that quite a few citizens endorse that studying in a small class is beneficial to students. I, however, hold the counterargument that studying in a large class is conducive to promoting both one’s academic learning and personal development.
What must be prioritized is that I have heeded that it’s persuasive to lend credence to that idea that studying in a large class would help promote academic learning, by acquiring more knowledge and triggering interest. To begin with, only in large class, can one have more opportunity to learn as much as knowledge. In detail, the larger the class is, the higher probability of students with variety knowledge you will meet, which you can learn through communicating with them; however, in a small class, it’s not likely that you will contact with distinct people. Besides, studying in a large class helps you develop your interests. Specifically, it enables you to make friends with individuals who share the same interest with you; in contrast, you will probably not able to find a classmate who has the same topic with you in a small class. Take myself as an example, last year when I took a culture class with eighty people, I had found several people who like playing guitar and finally we have established a band.
Another vehicle to my point of view is that studying in a large class benefits personal development, by promoting one’s interpersonal and cooperation ability. Initially, contacting with more people is conducive to learning how to deal with friends. To further explain it, you will have more chance to meet and contact with people like in group work regardless of whether or not you like it, you have to face it; in the contrary, how you to be trained in a small class. Moreover, your cooperation ability will be considerably strengthened. To be specific, there will be different kinds of people and you need to learn how to communicate with each other, given the varied habits they have; on the other hand, studying in a small class will largely limit your development due to the lack of diversity.
To sum up, sometimes it's not easy to tell whether my position outweigh others', given the comlex situation describe above. Nevertheless, after weighty consideration, I insist that studying in a large class will help to improve oneself in different dimensions such as academic learning and personal development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 602, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'help'?
Suggestion: help
...ple. Besides, studying in a large class helps you develop your interests. Specificall...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 71, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'benefit'?
Suggestion: benefit
... view is that studying in a large class benefits personal development, by promoting one’...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...people like in group work regardless of whether or not you like it, you have to face it; in th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, thus, in contrast, such as, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2271.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 447.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08053691275 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87039865262 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523489932886 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 700.2 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.6142131407 48.9658058833 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.588235294 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2941176471 20.6045352989 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.45110844103 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234704760418 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872364293316 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565795689223 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138265200241 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720296542671 0.0645574589148 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.