There is no shortage of debate about whether it is better to start a family in a large city or in a small town. In my opinion, it is more advantageous for young people to start a family in an urban environment. I feel this way for two reasons that I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, cities have more educational and cultural facilities for kids. When a couple starts a family, they want to be sure that their kids will have good educational and all the needed facilities to grow as a creative person. My own experience is a good example of this. I grow up in an urban area, so I went to one of the best schools in my country and had the opportunity to visit all kind of cultural events. My parents would take me to museums, art exhibitions, art galleries all most every weekend. As a result, I grow up as a very creative and well-educated person and now I have a well-paid job.
Secondly, big cities offer more job and career opportunities. Of course, everyone knows how costly is to have a family. You have to pay the bills, kid’s education and make sure they have everything they need. If you live in a large city you will make more money rather if you lived in rural area. For instance, my friend was living in a small town and her dad couldn’t find a job for months, so they moved to a bigger city and her dad found a job very easily. In addition, after just three months her dad got promoted for good work and now he makes even more money.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that it is better to start a family in a city rather in a small town. This is because cities are home to a verity of educational facilities for kids and can offer good career opportunities for parents.
- TPO-10 - Integrated Writing Task The sea otter is a small mammal that lives in waters along the western coast of North America from California to Alaska. When some sea otter populations off the Alaskan coast started rapidly declining a few years ago, it c 80
- TPO-47 - Integrated Writing Task Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered 78
- TPO-14 - Integrated Writing Task Every year, forest fires and severe stormscause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States. One way of dealing with the aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging, which is the practice 75
- TPO-43 - Integrated Writing Task Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitiv 85
- TPO-03 - Integrated Writing Task Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rem 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, of course, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1977.66487455 71% => OK
No of words: 324.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.31481481481 4.8611393121 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60584502386 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 212.727598566 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512345679012 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 618.680645161 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6570731858 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2352941176 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0588235294 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76470588235 5.45110844103 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0798577115745 0.236089414692 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0308290866592 0.076458572812 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401314419979 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0579669437123 0.150856017488 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402823412064 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
automated_readability_index: 8.4 11.7677419355 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.72 10.9000537634 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 86.8835125448 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.