Some people prefer to spend time with one or two close friends. Others choose to spend time with a large number of friends. Compare the advantages of each choice. Which of these two ways of spending time do you prefer? Use specific reasons to support your answer.
People are all different. Some people have just a few friends and tend to spend time with them or alone. Others are open for communication and like socializing in a big company of friends. Personally, I prefer to spend time in a company of many friends. There are a few reasons why I feel this way.
First of all, it is more fun when hanging out with a big company. A large group of people always can find something interesting to do, such as playing in a variety of group games. For example, when my friends and I get together, we like playing volleyball. Moreover, we like playing for a prize, which means that the winning team gets the reward. This way, the desire to win in the competition makes us play with the passion. During the games we encourage the teammates each, teasing the opponents, joking around, and overall having a great time. Conversely, if I had spent my time just with a few friends, I would not have had the opportunity to play volleyball because it is a group sport. Although sometimes, having a quiet private conversation with a couple of close friends can be very enjoyable and relaxing, the leisure in a big company is always more cheerful. To that end, the time in a large company brings me a myriad of positive emotions.
Secondly, in a big company, I can learn something new. A large number of friends always have something to share. It is true that the more people we communicate with, the more experience we share, and the more knowledge we gain. For instance, recently, during a large gathering of my friends, I met a doctor, who specializes in infertility. From him, I learned a lot about the modern techniques, which has been used to diagnose the causes of inability to conceive a child. As for a pharmacist, it was a priceless experience for me, since the new knowledge will undoubtedly help me to serve my patients better. If I choose to spend my time with one or two close friends, I will lack the possibility to meet new interesting people and to learn about some innovations in medicine. Although my closest friends are very educated people whom I like to talk on different topics with, they are not from the professional field I belong to. Therefore, being with a large number of friends helps me to grow as a professional.
To conclude, I like spending my time with a large number of friends. This is because in a vast company of friends I always have a lot of fun and improve intellectually.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: Many; Numerous
...big company, I can learn something new. A large number of friends always have something to share....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 955, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...eld I belong to. Therefore, being with a large number of friends helps me to grow as a professio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1017, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nds helps me to grow as a professional. To conclude, I like spending my time wit...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 43, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... conclude, I like spending my time with a large number of friends. This is because in a vast comp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, as for, for example, for instance, i feel, such as, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2000.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 439.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55580865604 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78335861228 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473804100228 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 638.1 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2546415484 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.0 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.56 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316889852199 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945411284645 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108530471863 0.0737576698707 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230677441123 0.150856017488 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0700916924745 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 11.7677419355 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.87 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.