some people prefer working for a very large company that has several hundreds employees. others prefer working for a small company where they know all of their co-workers. which do you prefer?
Work in each company with its specific features is a major challenge for who wants to find a job for himself. Some people prefer to be in large company with lots of employees. On the other hand, some others oppose this idea, and they believe workplace must be a small one that all of co-workers know each other. As a matter of fact, I agree with the second opinion, and I think friendly relations is necessary for each workplaces. A look at the positive results produced by such a working condition will justify this opinion.
Firstly, when you work somewhere, you shouldn’t suffer from being there. Your relationship with your partner is the most important thing that makes you comfortable. This situation usually happens when you are in a small company because all of workers know each other and there is friendly relation between them. For example, I worked in a small firm last year and all of my partners are my university classmates. We worked together and if one of us need help, others try to solve his problem. In addition to that, we laughed so much at firm and when the lunch time arrived, we got it together. Thus, this makes it clear that small companies have few workers who know each other and usually there are friendly relationships between co-workers.
Secondly, in large companies, when they have a serious problem in economic issues, handling this problem is so hard for them. This can be a major reason to most of workers get fired. It is a condition that rarely observed in small companies. Last week, I read a news in newspaper that workers of a famous large company in capital not working anymore because of their objections about their salary which is not paid in 5 month recently. So, it can be inferred from this happening economic problems in a small firms are solved easily than big ones.
As the above makes clear, working in small companies is better than the large ones. Friendly relationships among partners makes company a suitable place to work and stability in firms when they get in trouble especially economic problems is an important consideration for who want to choose a workplace. These positive aspects seem to be enough to work in such a companies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the workers') or simply say ''most workers''.
Suggestion: most of the workers; most workers
...for them. This can be a major reason to most of workers get fired. It is a condition that rarel...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'news'.
Suggestion: news
...d in small companies. Last week, I read a news in newspaper that workers of a famous l...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'month' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'months'.
Suggestion: months
...out their salary which is not paid in 5 month recently. So, it can be inferred from t...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 362, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a company' or simply 'companies'?
Suggestion: a company; companies
...pects seem to be enough to work in such a companies.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, i think, in addition, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1824.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76240208877 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62111344063 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509138381201 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0212743738 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.15 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353691234687 0.236089414692 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103541825552 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793983791683 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217342733648 0.150856017488 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707185187848 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.