Some people say that students learn the most important things in life inside the classroom Others believe that they learn the most important lesson of life outside the classroom Which option do you agree with Why Use specific reason and examples to suppor

Most people argue that valuable lessons of life are learned outside the classroom, but if we look carefully, it is the opposite. I strongly believe that the most important lessons of life are learned inside the classroom. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.

First, Collaboration is an important quality that every student must have to be successful in life, as it helps to work together with different people as a group. Students learn to collaborate through various activities inside the classroom. For example, group quizzes require all the students of the group to work as a team to win, thus making the students learn the skill of coordinating with others. My personal experience is an example of this. Four years back, when I was at University, I participated in a group quiz. The group consists of 5 members. We initially did not work as a team together. As a result, we lost the first match, but from the next match, we tried discussing among ourselves, which helped us greatly and win the competition. This activity inside the classroom helped me to gain the quality of collaborating with different people. Had I not participated in the group activity, I may not be able to gain quality of collaboration.

Secondly, helping nature is an essential lesson that is developed in the classroom. Some students may not be able to understand the lecture, so they turn towards their friends for help. Thus, when students help each other, it develops the overall helping nature of the students. For instance, When I was studying at the university, I was approached by my friend to help him in a lecture which he was not able to attend. So, I taught him the lecture, he was very happy about it and he became closer to me. By teaching him the class, I gained two things, more understanding of the topic and a good friend. This encouraged me positively to help people whether it may be inside or outside of the classroom.

There are many more life lessons that are learned inside the classroom. Thus, I believe that essential life lessons are learned inside the classroom though they are not explicitly visible, they are being learned in the background without our knowledge.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 187, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ey turn towards their friends for help. As students help each other it develops th...
^^
Line 6, column 615, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...c and a good friend. This encouraged me in a positive way to help people whether it may be inside...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 73, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... that are learned inside the classroom. Thus I believe that essential life lessons a...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, for instance, i feel, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 336.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78869047619 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77933328754 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514880952381 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.298037137 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.45 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311958886283 0.236089414692 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104013328615 0.076458572812 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140648669638 0.0737576698707 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23579854796 0.150856017488 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148495323345 0.0645574589148 230% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.