The trade off between to give money to beggars and to not give money to beggars has been lasting for very long time, and besides there have been a lot of debates regarding this topic. From my perspective, to help beggars is not right from both our and their aspects. I uphold this opinion for 2 main reasons, which I will explore in my following essay.
First of all, I would like to accentuate you that majority of beggars are human like us, but they refrain from working because they deem that it is not their problem that tey were born like this. However, they do not consider that they are plenty of successful people, who were also born in poverty. And if we help them with money, they will more get inclined to not work and earn their own money. So I suppose that in order to help them we have to encourage them to work instead of contributing some money.
In addition, if we assume that even we give them money, they will at most be satiated, but not have house or car as most of us. Consequently, we have to find a way to elucidate them significance of working and having own career otherwise it will not be that helpful for them. According to the surveys that were conducted, majority of beggars are hired by someone, who gives them very short amount of money. Beggars can not perceive what is happening around them and they literally do what their boss orders them. It is very problematic for both them and us, because they hinder our work sometimes by stopping us in the streets or roads and besides they also get 10 o 5% of whole money that they get from us. Therefore, we have to help them mentally instead of helping them financially which lasts ephemeral.
In conclusion, I would like to assert one vital point that every human suffers from something, some of them morally and some of them financially, and this statement engenders conclusion that we are roughly equal. Thus, non of us should complain and give up, because there is always solution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 373, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... they will more get inclined to not work and earn their own money. So I suppose t...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rk instead of contributing some money. In addition, if we assume that even we g...
^^^
Line 7, column 109, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...man suffers from something, some of them morally and some of them financially, an...
^^
Line 7, column 284, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ain and give up, because there is always solution.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, thus, i suppose, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 69.0 43.0788530466 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 358.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.51117318436 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37498675624 2.67179642975 89% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497206703911 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 505.8 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.9900998963 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.666666667 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8666666667 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.13333333333 5.45110844103 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160218727267 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063652746571 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378418556839 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110002302774 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398284676859 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.