Some people suggest working from home to decrease city traffic. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Use specific reasons and examples in your opinion.
It is certainly true that traffic in cities throughout the world has become a major problem. Especially in big cities, population growth causes numerous problems for people which also includes traffic congestion. According to me, we need to prepare a strategy in order to reduce the number of vehicles but suggesting people work from home is not feasible. I will elaborate on my reasons in the ensuing paragraphs.
First, instead of insisting on working from home, we actually have a choice by encouraging the people to carpool when they are traveling to their workplace. This indeed has an additional contribution as it indirectly reduces the amount of carbon dioxide floating in the air. Moreover, by reducing the number of cars on the roads will also have a major impact on air and noise pollution. For example, because of increasing air pollution in Delhi, people decided to carpool to reduce pollution.
Second, rather than working from home, hiring a private tutor for children, we should convince people to make alternative choices of using public transport. People are not using public transport because it’s the frequency of availability is less and not even comfortable. With a proper investment from government and effective contribution from people to abandon their private cars, we can step effectively to solve this problem. For instance, Singapore government controls numbers of the car possessed by people. Other people have to use public transportation.
Lastly, all professionals cannot work from home. For example, I am a physical therapist and I can not work from home. I have to treat patients and it requires my physical presence with a patient to examine the patient condition. Likewise, various other professionals require their physical presence at the workplace, such as doctors, nurses, cleaners, etc.
Let’s put in a nutshell, traffic problem can be resolved by improving public transport and suggesting people for carpool. I strongly believe that the suggestion of working from home is not a solution to the traffic issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-24 | ankitapatel | 41 | view |
- Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. 70
- What do you believe is the most important problem facing the world today? Why is it the most important? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
- It is more important to keep old friends than it is to make new friends 60
- Because modern life is very complex, it is essential for young people to have the ability to plan and organize. 61
- Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions Which do you prefer Use specific examples to support your answers 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...which also includes traffic congestion. According to me, we need to prepare a strategy in order...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 357, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... such as doctors, nurses, cleaners, etc. Let's put in a nutshell, traffic pr...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, lastly, likewise, moreover, second, so, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1739.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 329.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28571428571 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91654602289 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55623100304 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7717612208 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5263157895 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3157894737 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.36842105263 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250508045106 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081376934617 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593198361903 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145445701598 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448904334007 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.