Some people like to travel with a companion. Others prefer to travel alone. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice.
Travel is the best way to explore the world. In modernizing world, Because of technology travel has become easy for everyone. In addition, travel provides an opportunity for people to learn various things. People can learn about the culture, places, history, etc. People can develop numerous skills as well, such as communication, socialization, and many more. Some people prefer to travel with the companion, however, few disagree. In my view, travel with the other companion is more fun. It also provides few other benefits on which I will elaborate in my ensuing paragraphs.
First, a journey with the companion always become joyful. People do not get bored during their journey, they also participate in group activities. For instance, I went for a trip to New Mexico with my best friend Tanvi. I met Tanvi after a very long time, we had so much to catch up about our lives, and our journey time passed so easily. I did not have to think about any distraction to kill my time during my travel. Even I had so much fun while shopping at the market street in New Mexico. Tanvi has so many friends who live in that city. We planned to catch up with them at dinner. It was a memorable trip for me, I can definitely say that if I would have planned that trip alone then I might not be able to enjoy that much.
Second, when people travel with the companion work get divided and because of that trip become easy and organized. For example, I and my colleague planned to visit Vietnam. He is from Vietnam, he can speak Vietnam native language very fluently. He came to the US after his high school that why he speaks like a native speaker of Vietnam. He only planned our whole trip. He had his extended family in Vietnam because of that at few cities our accommodation at his relatives’ house. I had the opportunity to have traditional food at their relative’s house. During this tour, I got to know more about my colleague background, lifestyle, habits and many more. He arranged our trip in such a way that I got a chance to explore culture, history and religious traditional places of Vietnam. I had epic experience during this journey.
All in all, travel is one way to learn from others. Based on my experiences, I believe that a person can have more enjoyment while traveling with a companion. It also helps to understand more about our companion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 649, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had planned'?
Suggestion: had planned
... for me, I can definitely say that if I would have planned that trip alone then I might not be abl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...peaks like a native speaker of Vietnam. He only planned our whole trip. He had his...
^^
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ietnam. He only planned our whole trip. He had his extended family in Vietnam beca...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, then, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 43.0788530466 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1947.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 418.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65789473684 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66936015177 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502392344498 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 21.0 9.59856630824 219% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.5906787803 48.9658058833 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 64.9 100.406767564 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.9333333333 20.6045352989 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86666666667 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182340681481 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566671493183 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801804685547 0.0737576698707 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132658458303 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0967288014861 0.0645574589148 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.5 11.7677419355 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.16 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.002688172 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.