45. Some people like to travel with a companion. Other people prefer to travel alone. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice.
No one can deny that there are both positive and negative aspects about travelling alone or with companion. If I were forced to choose, I would definitely prefer to travel with my friends. It is my firm belief for a number of reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, if you travel with friends, you will be much happier, because in the evenings you can play different table games with your friends, which will supply you by positive emotions. Friends are the most important people in our life, that’s why the time spending with friends is magic time. I have to attend that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. You see, last year I went to Yerevan with my friends for a week. In the evenings we had a sit around fireplace, which was on the top stage of our hotel, and played different table games. I can’t even explain the feelings that I had during that time period. As a result we came back to our houses with unlimited supply of positive energy and unbelieveble feelings. For this reason I think that travelling with a companion is better than take a trip alone.
Secondly, during travelling with companion, you can exchange your minds with other people. Mostly 90% of successful projects was born in those conditions. During your trip you can tell about your minds and your projects to your friends and discuss them with them. Drawing from my own experience last week we went to Tsakhadzor with my friends. I told them about my project, which I wanted to start in a month, and we started to discuss the perspectives of that. Moreover we created a strategy by which I need to start those projects. Its certainly clear to see that travel with companion can be productive for each of members of the group.
To make a long story short, in light of above mentioned reasons, I strongly believe that travelling with companion supply you with positive energy and help you to be successful on your doings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 503, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ends for a week. In the evenings we had a sit around fireplace, which was on the top ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 463, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ed to discuss the perspectives of that. Moreover we created a strategy by which I need t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, second, secondly, so, i think, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 354.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69209039548 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56422653999 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519774011299 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4739654468 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.4210526316 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6315789474 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.73684210526 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26869166347 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839469223359 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780078475479 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172453276943 0.150856017488 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0118864674229 0.0645574589148 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 10.9000537634 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.