21. It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a big city. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to develop your essay.
No one can deny that there are both positive and negative aspects of growing up in the countryside or in a big city. If I were forced to choose, I would definitely prefer a big city for growing up. It is my firm belief for a number of reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, make our children to be more communicative. As they grow up in a place with a big number of children, they started to be more conversable while communicate with them. I have to admit that my opinion on this matter has been profoundly influenced by my own personal experience. You see, when I was young, we moved to a big city with my family. I started to play with children that were in my neighborhood. As a result I have myriad of friends from childhood. For this reason I think that growing up in big cities is better than in countryside.
Secondly, living in big cities get opportunity to take part in many shows, lessons, and master classes, which are also have impact on mental thinking of child. If you live in a big city, you can take your child to sport activity, or art and music classes. It will help them to create their future career. Drawing from my own experience, when I was child, my parents took me to programming classes. Since then I loved programming, and chose it as my profession. Moreover I went to a guitar classes, and now playing on guitar is one of my famous hobbies. It is certainly clear how big city can impact on your mental thinking, and take an opportunity to wade every day.
To make a long story short, in light of above mentioned reasons, I strongly believe that, if the child grow up in a big city, he will be more communicative, and will know what he need to take from life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... children that were in my neighborhood. As a result I have myriad of friends from ...
^^
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...ons, and master classes, which are also have impact on mental thinking of child. If ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 462, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ramming, and chose it as my profession. Moreover I went to a guitar classes, and now pla...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, while, i think, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1977.66487455 72% => OK
No of words: 325.0 407.700716846 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.36615384615 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6578026249 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541538461538 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2034837788 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.8333333333 100.406767564 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0555555556 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222406098191 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723427763213 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814668054456 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139407244762 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618048523802 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 11.7677419355 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.77 10.9000537634 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.