Some people like to travel with a companion. Other people prefer to travel alone. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice.
Travelling is something that we need once in a while to refresh our mind from our routines. I personally have not experienced solo travelling, but I can say that I prefer to travel with a companion. I will explore my reasons in the following essay.
First of all, travel with companions means that we have someone to share regarding our feelings towards the experience we have during the travel. When we travelling especially to new places, there are moments that often leave us in awe. We often get excited when we see something new and fascinating. Last week, I went to Singapore with my family. That was my second visit to Singapore and there is new attraction place, called Jewel, near Changi Airport. When we saw that for the first time, we were so excited and share our opinions about how huge and pretty the Jewel is, and how crowded it was. I was so glad that I spent my time in Singapore with my family that I could experience it together with them.
Second, one of the perks of travelling with companions is that we have someone to count on when we face difficulties. When we travel, we often experience new things that we did not anticipated before, but it will feel better when we have someone we know around us. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. I once did snorkeling with my friends in Lombok and unfortunately the weather and waves were not suitable for snorkeling. The waves were hitting us hard and we had trouble in swimming and going back to the seashore. To worsen the situation, there were two of my friends who did not wear floating jacket and they are not able to swim. Fortunately, with the help of my other friends, we all survived to come back to the beach. After years go by, every time we reminisce the moments, we still feel that snorkeling experience in Lombok was so special. Not only because we could spend our time together, but we also were so grateful that we had each other to save our lives during those terrifying moments.
In conclusion, I prefer to travel with friends than solo travelling. Besides we can share happy moments with our loved ones, we also have someone to help and protect us when we are in need.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 182, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'anticipate'
Suggestion: anticipate
...n experience new things that we did not anticipated before, but it will feel better when we...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 333, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'snorkel'
Suggestion: snorkel
... compelling example of this. I once did snorkeling with my friends in Lombok and unfortuna...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ves during those terrifying moments. In conclusion, I prefer to travel with f...
^^^^
Line 13, column 70, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Besides,
...avel with friends than solo travelling. Besides we can share happy moments with our lov...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, regarding, second, so, still, while, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 74.0 43.0788530466 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1800.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58015267176 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55425621758 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478371501272 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 567.9 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5692378756 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7142857143 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52380952381 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109874749088 0.236089414692 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515947529524 0.076458572812 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607509032203 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105582399816 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456345722117 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 10.9000537634 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.