It is undeniable fact that humans needs farmland and housing, but it is crucial to protect deteriorating species of animals. We live in compex, interdependent world, so factories and industries are indeed crucial to uplift economy. However, to save endangered animals is more sigficant due to following reasons.
Firstly, increase land to save wide life habit is basic requirement to maintain balance in ecosystem. It is well known fact that every organism in existence connected with each other for habit and food. For instance, tigers and other carnivores feed on deers, and deer consume green leaves. If there are very few tigers due to lack of adequate sanctuaries, deer population may increase. Moreover, deer compete with other animals or even with human for food. Thus, large number of deer population may lead to destruction of other species. Every organism in the ecosystem play significant role in regulating cycle effectively. As a result for sustainance of human it is imperial to save endangered species.
Secondly, predator of one species can be prey for other species. Fox serves as good example for controlling population of other species, they consume rodents and rabbits for survival. diminishing number of foxes, can increase number of prey species and in turn will compete with other animals. Furthermore, many organisms eat dead material and waste from the land and help in reducing land pollution.
On the other hand, there is already plenty of land available for growing grains, pulses and fruits for human consumption and for shelter to satisfy living needs, so ther is no need to destroy wild life habitat. Unfortunately, increasing number of factories and industries are culprit in contaminating air and water. Spilling oil in ocean might threaten species of fish and other marine habitat, while harmful green house gases in atmosphere may disturb other species and birds and increasing effect of global warming. In addition, small amount of land should be used for housing, and efforts should be made to construct sanctuaries to maintain animals.
To sum up, it is worth saying that advatages of saving land for animals outweighs benefits of using land for other purposes. Thus, human existence depends on life of other animals, if valuable species are reducing in numbers, survival of human would be very difficult.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n balance in ecosystem. It is well known fact that every organism in existence co...
^^
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ers due to lack of adequate sanctuaries, deer population may increase. Moreover, ...
^^
Line 5, column 185, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Diminishing
...nsume rodents and rabbits for survival. diminishing number of foxes, can increase number of...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 402, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd and help in reducing land pollution. On the other hand, there is already plen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tat. Unfortunately, increasing number of factories and industries are culprit in ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 43.0788530466 23% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1981.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25464190981 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75520345374 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546419098143 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8492054945 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3333333333 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9523809524 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 5.45110844103 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260202352465 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818081228554 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617366054947 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1567298442 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0178816925885 0.0645574589148 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.