Some people trust their first impressions about a person’s character because they believe these judgments are generally correct. Other people do not judge a person’s character quickly because they believe first impressions are often wrong. Compare these two attitudes. Which attitude do you agree with? Support your choice with specific examples.
Character of a person determine the influence a person can have in our life. If a person in positive minded character, she/he will definitely make our life better and vice versa. Hence it is important to judge a person's character and maintain a relation accordingly. In my view, I agree with the fact that people should not judge a person's character quickly, because first impressions can be often misleading. The factor for the above view are explained in the below paragraphs.
First of all, judging a person character quickly often leads to misconception, because a person's real character can be only identified over a period of friendship. Some persons might be timid, shy and reticent but many people can interpret the same timidness as rude nature and reluctant to speak to others. In view of example, I can recall an incident from my childhood. It was in the first day of 10th standard class, when I saw a new boy in my class, I went up to him introduced myself formally but that boy doesn’t respond properly, I found that behavior irritating and excoriated him for few days. But after 1 week the boy came and explained me that he was upset on the first day of school, because he missed old schools friend. Then after when started talking more often, now after 8 years he is my best friend. This really thought me that first impression about a person can be misleading and it important not to act based on this impressions.
In addition to the misconception, if we judge a person's character quickly and act based on it, there are high chances of coming to an incomplete conclusion with limited sets of data. In most of cases people tends to react the situation based on their perspective and inadvertently ignoring the others perspective. This impulsive behavior will create many adverse problems. Sometime people might become hotwired and react to incidents capriciously. In view of example, I can recall my acrimonious relationship with my class advisor in college days, on the first day of my college I went late to the class, my class advisor asked for the reason turning up late and I lied to him. After a week, he found that lied to him and black marked me during my entire college days. He never supported me after that, I found it very difficult to accept this act and he even failed to acknowledge my achievements during college. To be frank, I lied to him for the purpose of pranking. But in general I am usually sincere with my work, Hence it is not make capricious decision based on our impulsive thought based on the first expression.
By way of conclusion, based on the arguments explored above, I’m of the opinion that in most cases people should not judge a person quickly and conclude a person's character. It is essential to think in and understand other person’s perspective as well, In order to understand others perspective we should not act impetuously based on the first impressions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ly make our life better and vice versa. Hence it is important to judge a persons char...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...versa. Hence it is important to judge a persons character and maintain a relation accor...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'agree that'.
Suggestion: agree that
...n a relation accordingly. In my view, I agree with the fact that people should not judge a persons chara...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 333, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...the fact that people should not judge a persons character quickly, because first impres...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: a person; persons
...y often leads to misconception, because a persons real character can be only identified o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 940, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ng and it important not to act based on this impressions. In addition to the misc...
^^^^
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ion to the misconception, if we judge a persons character quickly and act based on it, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 295, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...spective and inadvertently ignoring the others perspective. This impulsive behavior wi...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 161, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...t judge a person quickly and conclude a persons character. It is essential to think in ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, hence, if, really, so, then, well, in addition, in general, first of all, in most cases, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2428.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 509.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77013752456 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74984508646 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82297147411 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465618860511 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 756.9 618.680645161 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1391550889 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.565217391 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1304347826 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.39130434783 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272407698789 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829734892046 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0857659117452 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195673634204 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664561839782 0.0645574589148 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.