Teaching methods have considerably evolved during the last decades, allowing pro-active interaction between students and teachers. Some people prefer old-fashioned teaching style where the teacher does all the talking because they believe that the teachers are the only person can provide the students with a wide variety of knowledge. However, from my perspective and actual observation of the life makes me believe that interactive classes are more an efficient way to learn and will help the students to acquire many skills. I will elaborate in more details below.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that I feel that classes where I have the opportunity to speak help to develop my intellectual abilities. Courses where the teacher does all of the talking are very passive, in my opinion. They mostly involve the memorization of facts and details which do not help students in the long run. On the other hand, classes which include a lot of debate and interaction create knowledgeable students since they can change idea, and thoughts together that will give them a better understanding of all the knowledge and incite them to think. I will give my self as a compelling example to illustrate this point when I was in pharmacy school I took a political science class that changed my way of thinking about the world. The cut and thrust of debate in the class made me consider where my political beliefs came from and if they were correct. I was required to listen to the opinions of others, so I was a more open-minded person after the class finished. I believe that I would not have developed in such a way by just listening to lectures. This example demonstrates how valuable discussion-based courses can be.
Another reason that deserves more words is that classes that involve a lot of discussions can help students develop the skills necessary to work well in groups. Many first-year students arrive at the university are very introvert and unable to communicate well. Discussions in class teach students how to communicate effectively, and they can use this skill to excel in their future careers. My older brother’s experience demonstrates that this is true. When he started university, he was a very introverted person and did not enjoy either communicating or working with others. However, after one year of participating in debates, discussions, and presentations in his classes he became a very confident communicator. As a result, when he began his career after graduation, he excelled in group work and was seen by his co-workers and supervisors as a natural leader. He was promoted quickly and advanced through the ranks of his company. Without participating in discussions with his professors and classmates, he would not have developed the skills necessary to succeed in this way.
As all things considered, the discussion in the class will bring numerous benefits for the students like the more debates the students involved in, the more knowledge they will gain, and they will acquire many communication skill which benefits them in the later life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 447, Rule ID: MORE_A_JJ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'a more efficient'?
Suggestion: a more efficient
...me believe that interactive classes are more an efficient way to learn and will help the students...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill elaborate in more details below. The first exquisite point to be mentione...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ilities. Courses where the teacher does all of the talking are very passive, in my opinion...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 697, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t when I was in pharmacy school I took a political science class that changed my ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ble discussion-based courses can be. Another reason that deserves more words ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, well, i feel, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2589.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 508.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09645669291 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74751043592 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9426460785 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490157480315 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 810.9 618.680645161 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5760348727 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.565217391 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0869565217 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.60869565217 5.45110844103 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2802479165 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747985140353 0.076458572812 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621615769357 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174290821762 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572257777299 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.