Education is the most important part of our life. People should be take education to improve their skills and quality of their life. Some people believe that classes with lectures and almost no discussions is better, others disagree. Personally, I believe that classes with open discussions between the professor and students is better for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
The main reason is that discussion-based classes ensure to express ideas of students. In addition, students can realize different ideas about topics, and thus they can improve their perspective and ideas. Hence, they learn take a different approach to something. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. When I was in university, last year we were discussing a case about some disease in groups. One group has 10 students, and then we discussing about epidemiology, psychology, and terminology of disease. All students told different knowledge due to the fact that we all investigated from different resources, and thus we learn different information about that disease. As you can see, if students learn in classes with discussion-based, they can both expressing their ideas and learn different knowledge.
The second reason is that discussion-based learning method improves communication skills of students. Students who learn with open discussions classes will learn speak and exchange their ideas in community eventually. They are comfortable while they are talking. For example, I can talk with others comfortably, owing to fact that we learned a lot of lessons in the open discussions classes. When I worked in hospital as a nurse, the first week that I started in there, I talked with our advisor and education nurse. Most of our friends were shiny when they talked with education nurse. I could talk with him professionally, and I could ask a lot of question on topic that I didn’t know. However, other nurses couldn’t ask what they wonder. This experience taught me that open discussions classes improve student’s communication skills.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that discussion-based classes are better than other classes because of the fact that not only ensuring to express ideas of students, but also improving student’s communication skills. We should all encourage the schools to increase the number of classes with discussion-based.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 223, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to take'
Suggestion: to take
...erspective and ideas. Hence, they learn take a different approach to something. My p...
^^^^
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to speak'
Suggestion: to speak
...ith open discussions classes will learn speak and exchange their ideas in community e...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 96, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...d classes are better than other classes because of the fact that not only ensuring to express ideas of s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, second, so, then, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2025.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37135278515 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18058704246 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485411140584 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 608.4 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.6954934938 48.9658058833 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0434782609 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3913043478 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.69565217391 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269747634313 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828674396957 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0836820516782 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187881058843 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522899433495 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.