Every student has his own preference of how they study and interact in their class. Some of them will be highly communicative in the class preferring discussions more than a lecture whereas others may have the opposite preference. Though both of them has strong points to argue, I prefer Lecture based class with almost no discussion for the following reasons.
First and foremost, classes are designed with a limited amount of time which is required to deliver the lecture, since nowadays teachers mostly come to class with a prepared lecture as part of the whole syllabus to be covered in a semester. This kind of organized lecture material is very important for higher studies like university curriculum where the subjects are very specific to their topics. In depth knowledge is required for this topic, that cannot be achieved by only reading books or papers in absence of a teacher specializing in that particular topic in most of the cases having a related doctorate degree. Hence this valuable opportunity should not be missed by the students for discussions in the class time which may cut short the effective time for both the lecture and the discussion.
On the contrary, time is not limited by the class only rather today their are other facilities for students for their group initiatives. For example students can discuss among themselves find out the key questions or points to be discussed with the professor during his counseling hours. This way many small groups will discuss the same problem from different angle to find out better solutions rather having a unregulated discussion in a class of sixty pupil and only one teacher, as I used to be during my undergraduate in engineering. I, myself have experienced far more enthusiastic and spontaneous participation in small groups rather than in a class crowded with students.
Finally, discussion in the class affects two type people the most. People having public speaking fear get totally muted in this social scenario, whereas, they can better communicate within the small group of known people. Moreover, Students having over confidence seek professor's attention sometimes with steering up unnecessary discussions. Thus teachers may get a false impression compared to other students in the class.
To conclude, though every coin has two sides, I believe the above mentioned reasons and example of situations in a class discussion well states its negative impacts on class schedule, quality of discussion and social bullying. And for these reasons I prefer classes with lecture and having very less discussion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 621, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ases having a related doctorate degree. Hence this valuable opportunity should not be...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
... limited by the class only rather today their are other facilities for students for t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 410, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...find out better solutions rather having a unregulated discussion in a class of si...
^
Line 5, column 455, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'pupil' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'pupils'.
Suggestion: pupils
...egulated discussion in a class of sixty pupil and only one teacher, as I used to be d...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 343, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...th steering up unnecessary discussions. Thus teachers may get a false impression com...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['finally', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'whereas', 'for example', 'kind of', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.266075388027 0.229887763892 116% => OK
Verbs: 0.141906873614 0.158761421928 89% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0931263858093 0.0866891130778 107% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0532150776053 0.046263068375 115% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0421286031042 0.0685040099705 61% => OK
Prepositions: 0.141906873614 0.118717715034 120% => OK
Participles: 0.0532150776053 0.0351676179071 151% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.75703330049 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0221729490022 0.0309702414327 72% => OK
Particles: 0.00665188470067 0.00188951952338 352% => OK
Determiners: 0.10199556541 0.0887237588012 115% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.019955654102 0.0209618222197 95% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0110864745011 0.0139019557991 80% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2592.0 2387.08602151 109% => OK
No of words: 419.0 408.028673835 103% => OK
Chars per words: 6.1861575179 5.86048508987 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48200974243 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.400954653938 0.338922669872 118% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.293556085919 0.251872472559 117% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.210023866348 0.174417080927 120% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.140811455847 0.112833075102 125% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75703330049 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54415274463 0.524397521467 104% => OK
Word variations: 62.8792068119 59.2087087015 106% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6684587814 82% => OK
Sentence length: 24.6470588235 20.5533526081 120% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3244597601 48.84282405 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.470588235 120.699889404 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6470588235 20.5533526081 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.764705882353 0.644075263715 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.54480286738 90% => OK
Readability: 54.0026674154 45.7405998639 118% => OK
Elegance: 1.94392523364 1.45489161554 134% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245316110094 0.300154397459 82% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.131940445525 0.103427244359 128% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0695687689485 0.0752933317313 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.555724759834 0.497263757937 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.110362858863 0.151897553556 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103968236253 0.114077575197 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735031786805 0.0781384742642 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.316649793679 0.336927656856 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.098516566006 0.067059652881 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16348102069 0.210909579961 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410567943751 0.0618886996521 66% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8870967742 59% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.86379928315 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.91756272401 142% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 8.42114695341 59% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.75985663082 217% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.6433691756 95% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.