Some students prefer to study and do homework alone. Others prefer to study and work on class assignments with a group of fellow students. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
How learners are studying their academic disciplines may heavily influence their grade of and attitude towards classes. Personally, I believe that studying fields of study with classmates is beneficial for students. I have three rationales for holding this opinion, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, members of study group will help others to understand some topics, which signifies that students will comprehend their lesson comprehensively. Most learners face some problems about their lesson because some of them might be difficult and ambiguous in some sense. Therefore, they may stay incapable of understanding the concept, so they may even fail the final exam containing the unclear idea if students study their subject alone. On the other hand, students who have study mates can ask from their peers about subject. Of course, their possibility of finding correct explanation about topic is better because their total knowledge is bigger than a single individual. Then, individual students will be available to understand the concept by being taught by others.
Secondly, having friends with whom individuals study is interesting and enjoyable for them, which means that their possibility of getting depression is low. Students might get stressed while studying their lessons, especially before the final exams because they confront enormous workload of assignments and tests. Furthermore, anxiety may occasion severe problems such as health issue and impoverished concentration. Nonetheless, it is quite reassuring to know that students have classmates who sympathize their problem. Then, they can avoid being depressed by virtue of lessons, so they will also avert other stress-related complications.
Finally, some indolent students will be required to study harder by their friends, so their grade may increase. There are a lot of students who are loath to immerse themselves to learning, thus their grades tend to be poor. Fortunately, their study partners will encourage them to pay more attention to their courses by requiring or just simply asking. For example, last semester, lazy girl joined my study club in the campus when her average grade was 2.0. Then, I started attempting to motivate her to work harder by telling her that she is capable of solving the issue. Later on, I recognized that her commitment was improved because I was constantly incentivizing her. Moreover, her average grade of the semester increased from 2.0 to 3.5, which was truly appealing for both of us. If she had not joined my study group, she would have ended up repeating her grades.
In summation, I am of the opinion that studying with other students is conducive and advantageous for learners. This is because they will share their knowledge, be less exposed to stress and other issue, and they will be encouraged by others.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 328, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ese ideas in the subsequent paragraphs. To begin with, members of study group wi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 783, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the concept by being taught by others. Secondly, having friends with whom indiv...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 642, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ert other stress-related complications. Finally, some indolent students will be ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 871, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uld have ended up repeating her grades. In summation, I am of the opinion that s...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, of course, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2425.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 454.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34140969163 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81533040888 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561674008811 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 726.3 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7964842223 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.434782609 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7391304348 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69565217391 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166903447904 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613793884718 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522538526832 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108496023286 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226736268532 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 86.8835125448 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.