At some universities, students take part in making decisions about the issues that affect daily life of everyone on campus, such as how many hours that the libraries should be open each day or what kinds of food should be served in the cafeteria. But at some universities, experts are hired to make these decisions, students almost never involved. Which approach do you prefer and why.
Universities always tend to take tactics to created better environment for students so that collecting ideas become necessary. Some people suggest that students should take part in person and others challenge it and support experts rather than students. From my perspective, I agree with the former one. Students have the duty and right to make decision.
First of all, the people who most familiar with campus environment are students themselves since they are living in the universities all day long, for studying or relaxing. So, they learn about where should be developed much deeper than experts who have no experience for feeling the campus daily life. For example, my university decided to build a club center according to expert's advice. However, as a student who spend the whole time living there, we regard this plan as a waste of money because compared with club center, what we need is a new library with meeting rooms where we can finish our group work projects. Therefore, we claimed the demand to leader and then this kind of library was set up and of course fully utilized by students and the great score proved that it really came in handy. Instead of listening to expert, the advice comes from students is more useful.
Moreover, the purpose of expert outside school may not be as pure as student There are some experts whose aim is not giving a hand to universities but earning more money without considering whether the strategy is suitable or not. Some cases imply that they frequently put the money into the top of their life and that is why I mentioned universities are not supposed to rely on their opinion. On the contrary, students do not require the reward from school. It is obvious that the hope among them is just develop surrounding environment and generate more convenient life since helping university is the best approach to help themselves. They are more likely to pay attention on the equipment or rules instead of dividing mind into financial return.
Furthermore, if some tactics are decided without students' agreement or support, these decisions will be hard to become practicable. When a new food showed up on cafeteria menu, it needs students eating tendency; when classrooms' open hours changed, it will advantage only by used for students; when a gym built, there will be no meaning if people refute to enter it. So, the opinion from students is much more significant than experts.
To put it in a nut shell, students should make decisions in person rather than totally rely on experts.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, really, so, then, therefore, for example, kind of, of course, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2114.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 429.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92773892774 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55995850755 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4716708166 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.263157895 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5789473684 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57894736842 5.45110844103 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245376493451 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068075880173 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489961413843 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133530560116 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0173488272458 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.