At some universities, students take part in making decisions about the issues that affect daily life of everyone on campus (such as how many hours that the libraries should be open each day or what kinds of food should be served in the cafeteria). But at some universities, experts are hired to make these decisions, students rarely involved.
Which approach do you prefer and why?
In today's modern and sophisticated world, making suitable decisions can shape people's lives wonderfully. In this connection, deciding about universities' issues plays a vital role in students' success. Although contested by many that the matter of hiring experts to make decisions about campus' plans is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I concur with the notion that students have the right to decide about campus activities, and I will analyze my reasons throughout this essay.
First, students have practical experiences at universities; hence, they can make the best decisions based on their valuable visions. To be more specific, a university provides services for students, so it should be matched with their interests. According to my own experiences, last semester, my university decided to change a library schedule and closed it in the evening to save energy. On the other hand, students studied in the library in the evening, and they could not use the library in the morning because they had classes. Moreover, in the evening, dorm rooms were very noisy and crowded, so much so that learners did not have an opportunity to read their books and materials. Therefore, by not considering pupils' notion, the university closed the library in the evening, which reduced students' productivity.
Second, students have a considerable amount of information about university surroundings, so universities can exploit their useful opinions. To elucidate, pupils are dedicating a wealth of time at university, and they use each place; however, experts spend their time at their office. For example, two weeks ago, the university announced that they would repair a parking lot, but students protested as they believe that the university should allocate budget for dormitory renovation. Accordingly, an expert came to observe the dormitory conditions to confirm students' claims. When he monitored dorms, he understood that valves ruined, and the air conditioner did not work well, leading to changing university beliefs.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on each side, I profoundly believe that learners should plan for universities. Not only can universities make a campus environment usable for students, but they also do not have precise data about all places.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 796, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...e library in the evening, which reduced students productivity. Second, students hav...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 819, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g, which reduced students productivity. Second, students have a considerable amo...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...not have precise data about all places.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2001.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 367.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45231607629 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96254839187 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58038147139 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4682242103 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.705882353 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5882352941 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47058823529 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227561887336 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713681326918 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383479209891 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136144031128 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222578736998 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.