High school students should be required to study many different subjects at the same time, or they should study only three or four subjects at a time. Which one do you prefer?
In today's modern and sophisticated world, education plays a vital role in students' lives. In this connection, each high school provides various courses for students. Although contested by many that the matter of studying many different subjects in high school at a time is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I concur with the notion that it can be a plus for learners to learn limited courses at the same time, and I will analyze my reasons throughout this essay.
First, learning different lessons provides insight into students' interests, which helps them to choose their major field of study at universities. To be more specific, if pupils become aware of different subjects, they will find in which real of education they are talented and continue it as the long-term majors. According to my own experience, when I was a high school student, I should learn many different topics. By doing so, I understood that I was not interested in chemistry, and I was terrible at math. I decided to follow physics as my main field at university according to the impressive performance which I showed at the high school; hence, I am satisfied that my high school forced learners to gain information in different subjects. Otherwise, I had no opportunity to find my interests.
Second, students can improve their knowledge by studying different subjects at university, thereby achieving an excellent resume. To elucidate, when learners have more general knowledge, they will face profound job opportunities in the future; moreover, they can apply for a vacancy based on their significant abilities which they have gained at high school. For example, my brother was required to pass several subjects at university, so he had information in many fields of study, leading to finding a profitable job without attending a university. Because he learned french, math, and music at school wonderfully, he became a private teacher after graduation from high school, and he is a thriving person in teaching; otherwise, he should register at university to improve his knowledge to find a career.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on each side, I profoundly believe that learning several skills at the same time has several advantages. Not only do learners decide about their future field without hesitation, but they also become professional in many skills.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ted by many that the matter of studying many different subjects in high school at a time is hi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...s a high school student, I should learn many different topics. By doing so, I understood that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 803, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ad no opportunity to find my interests. Second, students can improve their knowl...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mprove his knowledge to find a career. To conclude, while there are several arg...
^^^
Line 7, column 276, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lso become professional in many skills.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, moreover, second, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2052.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19493670886 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94891179188 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549367088608 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 640.8 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9129250976 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.25 100.406767564 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6875 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3125 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400619224949 0.236089414692 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120445894789 0.076458572812 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689096734642 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23356735551 0.150856017488 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545704972642 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.