new teaching method, professor record a video (lecture) in advance for students to learn, class time used to answer questions, and have discussions. Do you think this is an effective way and why?
Recently the phenomenon of efficient avenues to learn lessons has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of watching a video before attending classes is highly beneficial, such an issue regarded both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I believe that by studying topics of classes in advance and discussing them in classrooms, students have an ideal opportunity to learn effectively. I will analyze my reasons throughout this essay.
Firstly, the method of studying a lecture relating to the topics makes it easier for students to grasp the advanced level of information. To be more specific, when students watch a video before their classes, they can think about what they will learn. By doing so, their mind become prepared and familiar with topics before classes, so they can gain a high level of information. According to my own experience, when I was a high school student, my teacher asked students to watch chemistry educational videos before holding a class. Therefore, all the students know what we will discuss during class time, and we understood the basic concept by watching the lecture. Our teacher could talk about sophisticated parts of topics, which improve our information. Hence, we did not waste our time to learn simple parts of lessons.
Secondly, if learners watch a video before attending classes, they will have time during classes to solve their vague information or problems by discussing them, which leads to efficient learnings. To elucidate, there are some parts of lessons that students do not understand; however, asking questions makes them crystal clear. There is a time limitation for classes, and teachers do not have extra time to answer pupils' problems unless they have watched a video program before a class. For example, two years ago, I had a math class that my teacher taught the math book at the regular time of the school. After I went home, I could not comprehend some problems, so I decided to ask them in class time. Because there were many parts of the book which our teacher should talk about them, there was no time for me to ask my questions. Thus, my problems in math have never been solved, and I got a low grade in the math exam.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on both sides, I profoundly hold the view that watching an educational video before classes, and spending time during classes to answer learners' problems has significant effects on learning. Not only do pupils conceive advanced aspects of lessons, but they also can dedicate a considerable amount of time to ask their problems.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2192.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 438.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00456621005 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57476223824 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68586322479 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504566210046 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 670.5 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8715945783 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.6 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278293293128 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869126310355 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0588406223189 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176308098284 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0143116699059 0.0645574589148 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.