decreasing in otter population

Essay topics:

decreasing in otter population

The passage and the lecture discuss why the sea otters population of the Western coast of America started to decline. Although the author suggests three reasons to prove that environmental pollution is the main reason for the declining sea otters population, the professor believes that attacking by predators decreases the sea otters pollution.
First, the passage explains that recently, the level of chemicals that infect the sea otter has increased. However, the lecture believes that as there are no dead sea otters on the beach, the predators ate them.
Second, the text claims that, as the number of other small mammals such as sea lion decreased, environmental pollution should be the reason. The predators such as orcas, a large predatory whale, hunt the big animals, not the small species. Hence, the reduction in other species is due to pollution, not predation. On the other hand, the speaker explains that the orcas' diet change because humans predate whales. Thus, they hunt other species.
Third, the passage believes that the inconsistent pattern of animal declining is caused by uneven concentrations of pollutions along the coast. In contrast, the lecturer states that because of the orcas, there is an uneven pattern of mammals dwindling. As the orcas are so big, they could not access shallow or rocky locations. Hence, the sea otters population in these places is not reduced.
In conclusion, although the passage believes that environmental pollution is the reason for the declining mammals' population, the lecturer refutes all the passage reasons and believes hunting is the main reason.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The passage and the lecture discuss why ...
^^
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'otters'' or 'otter's'?
Suggestion: otters'; otter's
...age and the lecture discuss why the sea otters population of the Western coast of Amer...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'otters'' or 'otter's'?
Suggestion: otters'; otter's
...s the main reason for the declining sea otters population, the professor believes that...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 331, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'otters'' or 'otter's'?
Suggestion: otters'; otter's
...ttacking by predators decreases the sea otters pollution. First, the passage explains...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 343, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'otters'' or 'otter's'?
Suggestion: otters'; otter's
...llow or rocky locations. Hence, the sea otters population in these places is not reduc...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd believes hunting is the main reason.
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, second, so, third, thus, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 257.0 270.72406181 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28793774319 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68593559612 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501945525292 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 409.5 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 15.0 8.23620309051 182% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.6062407237 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0714285714 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185375972528 0.272083759551 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654538840157 0.0996497079465 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0980838836234 0.0662205650399 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11091382928 0.162205337803 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114200366431 0.0443174109184 258% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.