One of the most challenge problems in modern society is to have the most up-to-date skills for workplace. For solving this, government decides to give all adults over the age of 25 a training course to learn new skills. Do you think it is an effective way for government to spend its money?
In today's modern and sophisticated world, having up-to-date skills plays a vital role in becoming successful at work. In this connection, there are several avenues, which help people to gain last changes information. Although contested by many that the matter of holding a training course by governments to help workers grasp modern skills is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I concur with the notion that it is not efficient for governments to allocate money to teach over 25 people to become up-to-date, and I will analyze my reasons throughout this essay.
First, with the advent of technology and thanks to the internet, people can study updated courses in their workplaces fields through the internet, and they do not need governments to train them. To be more specific, a person can gain valuable information by just a simple click and surfing on the net, which is a convenient way to improve their knowledge. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, professors did not inform updated materials. After I graduated from university, I could not find an appropriate job stemming from my old information. Therefore, I decided to improve my data by searching on the internet; thus, I watched an impressive video instructor on Youtube, helping me to become employed in a desirable career based on my up-to-date skills.
Second, if governments dedicate funds to enhancing educational systems, they won't need to train workers after graduation to understand the latest information. To elucidate, when people become well-educated, they can match themselves with modern knowledge since the base of concepts is the same even after several years. Therefore, by comprehending concepts of their courses wonderfully, they can develop their abilities to high levels. For example, I studied IT at university, and I have learned how to code effectively; however, the software has changed since I graduated. When I was a student, I have figured out concepts of a computer programming well, leading to performing efficient codes in every up-to-date software because the foundation of programming is the same, and some details are changing during a time.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on each side, I profoundly believe that a government wastes their money if they dedicate it to retrain workers. Not only do people can learn recent abilities on the net, but they also need to get concepts at university to gain new skills.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'changes'' or 'change's'?
Suggestion: changes'; change's
...avenues, which help people to gain last changes information. Although contested by many...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2135.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20731707317 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03957732902 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556097560976 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 670.5 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.6792058135 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.4375 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18726071985 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574847591799 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463868640453 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111646375348 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066012569021 0.0645574589148 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 11.7677419355 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.