Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Sometimes people think nowadays the media (TV, newspaper, Internet) are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past, and the incorrect information may cause more problems for the public.
In today's modern and sophisticated worlds, the news is spread faster than before and affects people's lives significantly. In this connection, there are several avenues, which help people aware of recent reports. Although some people believe that the validity of the news presented nowadays is poor, many other people hold the view that today's' news is more precise than in the past. I concur with the notion that the news is not accurate like before, and I will analyze my reasons throughout this essay.
First, with the advent of technology, all people access the net, and they can publish any topics they desire; hence, media does not contain high accuracy news. To be more specific, a person who is not competent in the field of news publishing can write texts on the internet without permission from a skillful one. According to my own experience, the popular singer in my country is very sick, and he is undertreated in the hospital; however, people have posted he is dead occasionally, which is a rumor. Because no one monitors the news in the media, there is a high chance to read inaccurate data, which is defined false after it affects many people emotionally.
Second, people spread the news to gain benefits for themselves nowadays, and it does not matter whether it is right or wrong. To elucidate, many reports have advantages for some people and helps them to make money. For example, the man was posting that one school in our city was great, so many parents enrolled their children there, but they do not feel satisfied. After some researches, people realize that the man earned a tremendous amount of money by publishing that news since it seemed advertisement and did not include correct data. Accordingly, The report was not valid, leading to the advertisement aspect.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on each side, I profoundly believe that the recent news which is in the media is not correct. Not only does media is available for the public and allow them to write every rumor, but it also provides opportunities for people to advertise by spreading lying news.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 337, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...r, many other people hold the view that todays news is more precise than in the past. ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 162, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'be'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: be
...dia is not correct. Not only does media is available for the public and allow them...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, hence, however, if, second, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1758.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 357.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9243697479 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6072578751 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563025210084 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3559922986 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.2 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205385191359 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680438661858 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447953850649 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127872225178 0.150856017488 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286871883665 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.