Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The way people dress is a good indication of his or her personality or character.
In today's modern and sophisticated world, understanding people's attitudes are very complicated. In this connection, there are several avenues in which people can be familiar with a person's personality. Although contested by many that the matter of knowing one's character through their clothes is beneficial, such an issue is regarded as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I concur with the notion that the way people wear dresses does not indicate their character, and I will analyze my reasons throughout this essay.
First, the way people wear clothes depends on situations that they should go to, so it is not relating to their personality. To be more specific, different places require distinctive clothes which are appropriate for that area. For example, I found a friend in a gym; hence, I could not judge him according to his clothes since all people should have sportswear. Moreover, the second time that I visited him was in the luxury restaurants where people should dress formally. As a result, it was not a good idea to consider his personality due to his clothes because he did not choose them deliberately; however, his dress was suitable for the places.
Second, people select their dress in respect of rules, and there is no correlation between their dresses and personality. To elucidate, workers should dress in the same way and in the way that the manager approves them; thus, people cannot distinguish between their colleagues' character since they wear like each other. According to my own experience, when I worked at a company, I did not know that employers should wear in a specific way. On the first day of my work, when I saw one of my co-workers, I thought she was severe as she wore a formal dress. After a few hours, I met another worker wearing clothes which were less formal than the first one, and it was pink, so I considered her as a fun person. However, I thought about their personality incorrectly because the who wore a formal coat was so friendly, and his position in a company forced her to wear those clothes. Moreover, who wore a pink shirt behaved aggressively because his pink shirts were compulsory according to his career.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on each side, I profoundly believe that clothes are not an accurate indication of one's behavior. Not only do people choose clothes due to places where they want to attend, but they also wear specific clothes to obey the rules.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... in which people can be familiar with a persons personality. Although contested by many...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 423, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a specific way" with adverb for "specific"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...did not know that employers should wear in a specific way. On the first day of my work, when I sa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 130, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...othes are not an accurate indication of ones behavior. Not only do people choose clo...
^^^^
Line 8, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ear specific clothes to obey the rules.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, thus, while, for example, as a result, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2069.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 421.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91448931116 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78529467164 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524940617577 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2129286287 48.9658058833 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.944444444 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3888888889 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239219816951 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745333861758 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475303519944 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140772125785 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450698807389 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.