At some universities, students take part in making decisions about the issues that affect daily life of everyone on campus such as how many hours the libraries should be open each day or what kinds of food should be served in the cafeteria. But at some un

Essay topics:

At some universities, students take part in making decisions about the issues that affect daily life of everyone on campus such as how many hours the libraries should be open each day or what kinds of food should be served in the cafeteria. But at some universities, experts are hired to make these decisions, and students are almost never involved. Which approach do you prefer and why?

Undoubtedly, the rules which are related to campus life have a profound effect on the students’ performance and their career in the future. Each university should try hard to make the best setting for its students. Although some people adamantly claim that professional experts should be hired to make the decisions related to everyday life in campus and provide their arguments, others hold an opposite point of view and assert that students who live in campus could do this job better. Personally, I am of the belief that it would be better for a university to use its students’ ideas about these issues. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, the students who live in the campuse are facing with these issues every day. Such decisions wich are related to library or dining hall or even bus services could influence their lives seriously. For example, I can remember when I was an undergraduate student and lived in dormitory several years ago, the university decided to improve the students’ life condition in campuse. So the administration office made a questionnaire and distributed it among all the students living in dorm. The questionnaire was about the regular rules in dorm and asked the students to give their idea to have a better life in campus in order to enhance the students’ performance in the university. Fortunately, this plan was so successfull and after two months, the university implemented most of the students’ ideas. Luckily, the university achieved a siginificantly higher ranking in the country after that. That’s why I think that this solution is applicable in each university which is concerned about its students’ function.
Second, the university could save money. Undoubtedly, hiring some experts who are experienced in modifing such policies in the universities would cost a lot of money. Besides, there is no gaurantee whether their plans is effective in the university or not. For example, despite my university’s successful experience, my brother’s university followed a different way. His school hired some professional people who were so famous in the country. Even though the university paid a huge amount of money, it was a big failure for the university since the experts were unfamiliar with the different situation in our city. The money paid to them could be used in purchasing modern facilities for library or labs, but the university wasted it without getting any idea from its students. ‘
All in all, in my perspective, the universities could ask for help from their students in makin decisions for issues that are related to the every day campus life. Not only the student could give a comprehensive idea, but also the university could save money doing this. I would suggest each universty to do this to have a high performance students.

Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:


Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 138, Rule ID: ANINFOR_EVERY_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'the everyday'?
Suggestion: the everyday
...ecisions for issues that are related to the every day campus life. Not only the student could...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, second, so, for example, i feel, i think, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2425.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 472.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13771186441 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06777832072 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495762711864 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 787.5 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0448570051 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.434782609 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5217391304 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4347826087 5.45110844103 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154481488862 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499464161698 0.076458572812 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449671563424 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109392605531 0.150856017488 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524645018303 0.0645574589148 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.